AI Rate Professor

Education

Paul Moosman

CHILD901 · CHILD51 · CHLD90P4 · CHLD904 · ECE60602 · CHILD1360 · ECE60AND602 · CHLD90 · CHLD902 · CHLD901 · COUN901 · CHLD51 · CHILD60 · CHILD904 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you need the course and are ready for heavy writing and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderSo Many PapersSlow GradingAttendance StrictField Knowledgeable
  • Classes are writing-heavy with long, detailed papers and .
  • and late work is often rejected.
  • Fans call him engaging and expert in ECE; and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Multiple students say As are rare; long papers and .

Both formats stress tough grading; online .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content is ECE-focused and not always conceptually brutal, but volume of writing and standards raise challenge.

In-person reviews dominate; online echoes heavy writing and research.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and absences or tardies cost points.

In-person evidence is strongest; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; recommendation hinges on willingness to write extensively.

Online reviews lean more negative on organization; in-person is more split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

; students say you can almost never write enough.

Format shift

Consistent across online and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

So , and multi-page assignments dominate feedback.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy writing; in-person emphasizes 6+ page papers.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Knowledgeable and sometimes inspiring, but , and mixed clarity pull scores down.

Format shift

In-person fans highlight engagement; online critics highlight inconsistency.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

and journals with little to no traditional testing.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe interactive, paper-heavy ECE classes with , and polarizing teaching personality.

Main concern

Extreme paper load and .

What students said

“ .”
CHILD904
“He counts every minute you are out of class”
CHILD904
“he is a so write clearly and extensively.”
CHILD904

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some praise timely help and detailed writing expectations, and poor online organization.

Main concern

, and no late work frustrate online students.

What students said

“He doesn't accept late work at all even though he takes so .”
CHILD51
“Paul is the and a .”
CHLD901
“He gives great feedback and .”
CHLD901

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students repeatedly note few or no exams; assessment is papers and participation.

No testsPaper-based assessmentJournalsDiscussion boards online

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation with no exams reported.

No testsLong papersParticipation points
“ though.”
904
“you write like 6-7 papers ( )”
CHILD904

Online

, and group projects rather than proctored exams.

Discussion boardsGroup projectsDetailed writing
“Be sure you are interacting with the online mates during the discussion boards.”
CHLD901
“He has you do a and confusing.”
COUN901

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a so write clearly and extensively. My papers were usually 6 or more pages that received decent grades.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews (4 online, 36 in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Paper Load

22/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“I do not know anyone who received an A. i worked hard for a B but i loved the class!”

⏱️

35/100

“He doesn't give you .”

👎

42/100

“ . DO NOT RECOMMEND.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very interactive teaching style
  • loves to hear himself talk, sing and tell stories
  • lectures are engaging and easy to follow

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so write clearly and extensively
  • So many papers
  • you can almost never write enough for him

Theme 3

📅

  • He counts every minute you are out of class
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • Going to class is necessary to get the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews with recurring paper-load and and both formats.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CHILD90412 reviews
CHILD514 reviews
CHLD9014 reviews
CHLD9044 reviews
9043 reviews
Show 10 more courses
CHILD9012 reviews
CHLD512 reviews
ECE606022 reviews
CHILD13601 review
CHILD601 review
CHLD901 review
CHLD9021 review
CHLD90P41 review
COUN9011 review
ECE60AND6021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3