AI Rate Professor

Agriculture Natl Resources

Heidi Herrmann

SUSAG109 · SUSAG120 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if ; skip poorly structured farm courses.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringClear ExpectationsLacks StructureMicromanagesPatient
  • Reviews split sharply between a caring intro instructor and an unstructured crop-planning course.
  • Grades of A and A+ with light-to-moderate .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Both reviewers earned A or A+ and and easy to meet.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro-level work is not overwhelming, though one course felt shallow rather than hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One strong yes with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students report A and A+ with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Intro workload is described as not overwhelming when the course is organized.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Passion and patience shine in one class, while another lacks structure and student interest.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus on class structure and .

Format shift

All assessment evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and clear intro teaching to unstructured farm wandering with micromanagement.

Main concern

Some sections lack structure and treat students like kids.

What students said

“Very patient and .”
SUSAG120
“Crop Planning class lacked structure and clarity.”
SUSAG109

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very patient and . Really knows her stuff but is also open minded and allows for applicable discussion in class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2022. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Caring Presence

58/100

“Very patient and .”

📋 Structure Gap

35/100

“Crop Planning class lacked structure and clarity.”

🎯

82/100

“ and easy to meet.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really knows her stuff but is also open minded
  • Instructor is passionate about farming, but doesn't seem very interested in students
  • Treats us like kids and micromanages

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The amount of work is not overwhelming at least in this intro level class
  • Didn't really get deep into learning about crop planning
  • A+

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews across six years with mixed tones and limited detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SUSAG1091 review
SUSAG1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values