AI Rate Professor

Communication

D Frontczak

PHIL51488 · PHIL101 · PHIL5 · PHIL7547 · PHIL5495 · PHIL6 · PHIL3 · PHILPHIL · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless you must take philosophy and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedTough GraderLots of HomeworkVague AssignmentsTeach Yourself
  • Large review set is dominated by disorganization, vague prompts, and .
  • Recent online and classes.
  • Workload is heavy with papers, homework, and ; some older reviews note easy As.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some older easy-A notes exist, but , and heavy effort for average grades.

Online reviews emphasize busywork and hard grades; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content can be passable, but , and .

and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping hurts.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

and many students say run or .

and in person, especially recent reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and comments dominate, with vague rubrics and hard essays or tests.

Format shift

Harsh grading appears in both formats; a .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and time-consuming online work are frequent.

Format shift

Heavy workload is reported online and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

, and teaching yourself from the book.

Format shift

Both formats criticize organization; a minority of older in-person reviews praise patience.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Courses mix heavy papers and .

Format shift

Test-heavy tags and papers appear across formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly , and students teaching themselves.

Main concern

Disorganization plus harsh or and tests.

What students said

“She is the .”
PHIL5
“By far the .”
PHIL3
“The only plus about this class is the .”
PHIL5

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are called disorganized disasters with , and .

Main concern

, and inconsistent due dates or responses.

What students said

“I thought this class was going to be less challenging because it was online, but I was wrong.”
PHIL3
“This was the .”
PHIL3
“ work.”
PHIL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as hard and test-heavy, with some online tests; .

Hard TestsTest HeavyOnline TestsEssays and Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and large essays; some note tests online.

Test HeavyHard TestsOnline TestsSo Many Papers
“A lot was required and the .”
PHIL3
“The only plus about this class is the .”
PHIL5

Online

and hard while ; proctoring tools are not clearly proven.

Hard TestsLots of HomeworkTough Grader
“ and hard.”
PHIL3
“She assigns so !”
PHIL3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run as fast as you can away from anything that she teaches.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (6 online, 44 in person), highlighting recurring organization and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

14/100

“ .”

📂 Disorganization

20/100

“She is the .”

📝

22/100

“she is a .”

📚 Heavy Workload

24/100

“She assigns so !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Frontczak makes you teach yourself
  • Never introduces her lectures, just jumps right into them
  • This woman is a disaster

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and she grades HARD
  • Participate and do all of the A
  • work

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Super condescending
  • She is condescending, rude, biased and burnt out
  • She's a kind woman and is willing to work with her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years with detailed , and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 58
3 out of 56
2 out of 516
1 out of 516

Course coverage

PHIL525 reviews
PHIL315 reviews
PHIL1012 reviews
PHIL514882 reviews
PHIL62 reviews
Show 4 more courses
38441 review
PHIL54951 review
PHIL75471 review
PHILPHIL1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1