AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Jill Kelly-Moore

HUMAN0990 · HUM5 · HUMN21 · HUMAN5 · HUMANITIES6 · HUMAN6 · HUM21 · HUM6 · HUMAN5000 · HUMANITIES5 · HUMANITIES1 · HUMAN21 · 126 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if and will do the reading; skip if you need a chill GE or dislike confrontational teaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate but polarizingHeavy readingNo midterm or finalSo many papersCan be rude
  • Students either call her life-changing and inspirational or rude and closed-minded.
  • Workload is reading- and and .
  • Attendance and keeping up with books matter more than sitting for a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is reachable if you read, write weekly, and engage, but it is not free and .

Nearly ; the single online review reported a C with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is approachable if you keep up with novels and short write-ups, not dense technical theory.

In-person reviews dominate; online sample is too thin to change the overall picture.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and students say skipping risks failing.

Both the online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About two in ; praise for passion .

In-person opinions are split; the one .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and fair; others report tough paper grading and .

Format shift

; in-person is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and projects create constant work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many students call her inspiring and life-changing, while a large minority describe rudeness and closed-mindedness.

Format shift

In-person evidence is rich and split; online adds one mixed negative tone note.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

is common; grades , and projects.

Format shift

; online also stresses journals and readings.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

deep passion and inspiration for some, rudeness and .

Main concern

Feeling disrespected or graded down when opinions clash with hers.

What students said

“I don't know why so many people are angry! She is by far one of the most influential people I have met in college.”
HUM6
“Easily the .”
HUM6
“Oh, and NO EXAMS.”
HUM5

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online HUM5 review describes an old-school, tough-graded experience with mixed feelings on tone and visual journals.

Main concern

and a standoffish style online.

What students said

“Old School style teacher with lively lectures, And powerful words.”
HUM5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Most sections replace traditional exams with reading quizzes, short writes, and projects.

No midterm or finalReading quizzesWeekly short papersGroup projects

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, students repeatedly report , with quizzes and weekly writing instead.

No midterm or finalPop quizzesWeekly write-upsGroup projects
“ . but weekly 400 word writes up on a reading and reading quizzes”
HUM6
“Oh, and NO EXAMS.”
HUM5
“ . I'm highly recommanded her.”
HUMAN5

Online

Single online review does not clearly describe exam software or proctoring; journal.

Visual journalTough grading on few items
“Visual journal matters a lot, and just read the books youll be far better off.”
HUM5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Jill is by far the most inspirational instructor I've ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (1 online, 49 in person), highlighting passion, workload, and split recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🔥 Polarizing Passion

68/100

“She is passionate about her work and it really shows in her lectures each week.”

📚

28/100

“Get ready to read multiple books and .”

🧭 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ ! Jill is an amazing person all around!”

📝 Assessment Style

78/100

“ in her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is by far one of the most influential people I have met in college.
  • Very rude and disrespectful.
  • She lived through a lot of the events she speaks about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you want an A, you have to work for it.
  • You will get an easy A if you keep up with the reading and .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • .
  • I feel violated.
  • She can be a bit rude or standoffish if there is a misunderstanding.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

126

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years with rich, , and interpersonal style give strong confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 565
4 out of 527
3 out of 515
2 out of 55
1 out of 514

Course coverage

HUM614 reviews
HUMAN612 reviews
HUM57 reviews
HUMAN57 reviews
HUMANITIES62 reviews
Show 8 more courses
15191 review
HUM211 review
HUMAN09901 review
HUMAN211 review
HUMAN50001 review
HUMANITIES11 review
HUMANITIES51 review
HUMN211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 11

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1