AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Fred Utter

MATH150A · MATH9 · MTH155 · STATS15 · MATH15 · MATH1515 · MATH155 · MATH58 · MATH5107 · STATS · MATHCALC · 100 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself from the text.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude and CondescendingUnorganized LecturesTest HeavyTeach YourselfSkips Steps
  • Many students say , and leave you teaching yourself from the book
  • Grades lean heavily on a while
  • Rude or condescending responses to questions are a repeated complaint

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Exams dominate the grade, , and many students report low grades despite effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and students often rely on the book alone.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and punish lateness, while others say roll stops after early weeks.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and most detailed comments warn others to stay away.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

, and no late work make high grades hard to earn.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

but counts little; the real load is preparing for .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Frequent board mistakes, skipped steps, and impatient answers dominate recent reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Students repeatedly say a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and a strong need to self-study.

Main concern

Condescending answers, changing due dates, and .

What students said

“ and rude. Offers no help at all and will respond to your question with another question.”
MATH155
“Only 8% of the grade is based on homework, the remaining 92% ”
MATH155
“If you want to teach yourself, this is a class for you.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, often harder than class examples, with .

Test HeavyNo Note CardHard ExamsHomework Low Weight

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and minimal homework impact.

Test HeavyNo Note CardHard Exams
“Only 8% of the grade is based on homework, the remaining 92% ”
MATH155
“NO note card for tests.”
MATH155

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stay clear of Fred Utter!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“His lectures are long and unclear. Although he attempts to answer your questions, it is extremely .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

24/100

“Homework barely affects your grade so if .”

🗣️ Classroom Climate

20/100

“Very rude and gets annoyed when asked for help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Would constantly make mistakes during lecture
  • skips multiple steps and will act surprised when the
  • I learned way more from the book than him.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • TEST HEAVY
  • you have
  • Be ready to work your butt off if u want anything better than a C.

Theme 3

😤 About Tone & Help

  • He called us stupid on numerous occasions.
  • condescending & unapproachable
  • Don't bother asking questions in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

100

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show a strong negative consensus with only a minority of positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 514
3 out of 511
2 out of 527
1 out of 531

Course coverage

MATH15525 reviews
MATH1510 reviews
MATH584 reviews
MATH15152 reviews
51011 review
Show 8 more courses
581 review
MATH150A1 review
MATH51071 review
MATH91 review
MATHCALC1 review
MTH1551 review
STATS1 review
STATS151 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

4

D 3 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3