AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Morris Hamm

BADB · BAD59 · BAD56 · BAD2 · BAD18 · BAD1 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can self-study from the book; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught accountingOpen-book examsSlow to gradeBoring PowerPointsHomework-driven grades
  • In-person classes lean easy if and read the book yourself.
  • Online sections draw sharp complaints about silence, delayed grades, and no teaching.
  • Older reviews praise a nice, helpful pro; newer ones say he checked out mid-semester.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

tries, and many tests are open book or open note.

Easy-A ; online reviews focus on grading delays rather than grade difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro accounting content is manageable if you read and practice, though lectures add little and .

; in-person adds short problem sessions some students find unhelpful.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some terms list attendance as , while others say attendance was not required.

; in-person reports are mixed between mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Would-take-again sits near 43 percent because and online failures.

; both online reviews warn strongly against the format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students report open-book or open-note tests, unlimited Connect attempts, and .

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in older in-person reviews; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Expect and reading, but the load is usually doable if you keep up weekly.

Format shift

; online students stress teaching yourself the whole book.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

He is often called nice and sometimes helpful, but many call lectures boring, book-bound, or checked out.

Format shift

; online teaching presence is widely described as missing.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Homework and tests a smaller share in several reviews.

Format shift

; online comments emphasize ungraded midterms.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person he is often described as nice but dry, with , and open-book tests.

Main concern

Lectures can feel useless for tests and some semesters he stops putting real effort into class.

What students said

“ . He would go to class and present a 25 min Prezi presentation and then we would send us home.”
BAD2
“Gives out . ...”
BAD1
“The , so as long as you do that along with the final project you'll be totally fine.”
BAD1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online feels like an timely grades.

Main concern

, and zero useful feedback.

What students said

“Hamm is unresponsive, has graded hardly anything, and does not provide valid or .”
BAD59
“basically you teach yourself from the textbook. .”
BAD18

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Multiple reviews describe open-book or keeps exam risk lower.

Open BookOpen NotesNotecard AllowedMultiple Choice

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students repeatedly describe open-book or open-note tests and .

Open BookOpen NotesNotecard AllowedHomework heavy
“All testsfinal multiple choice w 3x5 notecard.”
BAD1
“you are allowed both your notes and book on the tests test.”
BAD1
“Gives out .”
BAD1

Online

Online reviews mention midterms but .

Slow grading on exams
“Just took second exam and still don't .”
BAD59
“the semester ends next week and he still ”
BAD18

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“basically you teach yourself from the textbook. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews spanning a , and online failure modes. Credibility rating: High.

📚

48/100

“I felt that I was really teaching myself. After a week or two of lectures, he decided that he will only go through practice problems”

📗

78/100

“Gives out . ...”

🐌

20/100

“Just took second exam and still don't .”

👍

70/100

“ and wants his students to succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • VERY dry, VERY boring! Does not motivate students to learn.
  • lectures are just extremely boring. They're all powerpoints straight from the book.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The
  • if you've done the HW and .
  • Easy B

Theme 3

💻 About Online Sections

  • Hamm is unresponsive, has graded hardly anything
  • basically you teach yourself from the textbook. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews span 2009-2019 with consistent self-study and .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

BAD17 reviews
BAD27 reviews
BAD181 review
BAD561 review
BAD591 review
Show 1 more courses
BADB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values