Nat Wall

MATH27 · MATH150A · MATH4 · MATH15 · MATH155 · MATH58 · MATH151 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 42/100
RMP rating: 3.2/5
Take again: 50%
Difficulty: 3.7

The decision

if you already have a solid math base or a tutor ready—lectures alone are unreliable.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture MistakesLots of HomeworkTest HeavyCaring but ConfusingMixed Reviews

and and error-prone.
and tests often feel much harder than practice.
and accessibility help some sections more than others.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Strong students report easy A's with heavy work, but weaker students report D grades and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Fast, incomplete, or error-filled lectures force many students to relearn material outside class.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and others mandatory, so flexibility depends on the term.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

About half would take him again; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

appears in some terms, yet tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Frequent 50-plus problem sets, weekly quizzes, midterms, and finals dominate student complaints.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Caring access and fun activities clash with frequent lecture mistakes and confusion.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Test-heavy design with midterms and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

to chaotic lectures full of self-corrections.

Main concern

Inconsistent lecture accuracy and .

What students said

“You'll spend half of the class redoing, unlearning and correcting mistakes the teacher has made.”
MATH155

“He gave tons of . Overall the class itself was not hard at all; however, a lot of work needs to be put in.”
MATH4

“His lectures were all over the place and many times he even confused himself with what he was trying to do.”
MATH27

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes as a softer exception.

Test HeavyMidterm and FinalTake-Home QuizzesHarder Than Homework

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and hard in-class tests that .

Test HeavyTake-Home QuizzesHarder Than Homework

“Grade based TONS of , and final.”
MATH4

“The tests are the hw difficult times 10... .”
MATH27

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“You'll spend half of the class redoing, unlearning and correcting mistakes the teacher has made.”
Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture errors, workload, and care. Credibility rating: Medium.

🔀 Teaching Consistency

46/100

“His lectures were all over the place and many times he even confused himself with what he was trying to do.”

📚 Workload Load

28/100

“there is always 50+ .”

💚 Care Factor

70/100

“He genuinely cares about his students and wants them to succeed.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Lecture Clarity

went way to fast and
always making mistakes on what their saying
Prepare to relearn everything after class

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

Nat is a nice guy
very caring and informative instructor
and

Theme 3

📝

Lots of homework
TEST HEAVY
Quizzes and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

12 in-person reviews from 2018-2019 give solid detail but polarize sharply by course and term.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54

4 out of 52

3 out of 51

2 out of 52

1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH274 reviews

MATH150A2 reviews

MATH1552 reviews

MATH151 review

MATH1511 review

Show 2 more courses

MATH41 review

MATH581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

A 2

B range

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

D 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Nat Wall

x x x if you already have a solid math base or a tutor ready—lectures alone are unreliable.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Challenging

Varies

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🔀 Teaching Consistency

📚 Workload Load

💚 Care Factor

⚠️ About Lecture Clarity

❤️ About Character

📝 x x x x

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you already have a solid math base or a tutor ready—lectures alone are unreliable.

📝