AI Rate Professor

English

Abby Bogomolny

ENG1A · ENG4778 · ENGL5 · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENGL1756 · ENGSECT · ENG0781 · ENG4A · ENGL0785 · ENG4 · ENGL4ABC · ENG4782 · ENG5 · ENG0757 · ENGLENGL · ENGL05 · ENGLISH4A · ENG0 · ENGL1A · ENG305 · ENGLI1A · ENGL4800 · ENG0749 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Consider her creative writing sections if you connect with her style; be cautious with composition courses.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing graderDiscussion-heavyStrong opinionsCreative writing strengthUnclear essay prompts
  • Reviews and biased or .
  • Creative writing courses draw far more praise than Eng 1A or Eng 5.
  • , and political or personal bias are common complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some call her an easy A, but many report tough, biased, or .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Reading and and heavy or confusing for others depending on course.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and participation heavily affects success.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About half the voice is strongly positive, especially creative writing; .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some say generous rewrites and fair grades; others report biased or opaque essay scoring.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

some courses light, others lots of homework and many papers.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Split between inspirational discussions and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Essays, papers, discussions, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some find her caring and and lectures dull.

Main concern

Essay expectations and grading consistency feel unpredictable, especially in composition classes.

What students said

“ and ”
ENG1A
“By far the sweetest professor I have ever had. She is very committed to her student's success.”
ENG305
“ ! !!!”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essays and discussion, not heavily proctored testing.

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Primarily essay and discussion based; .

Essay heavyDiscussion basedParticipation matters
“ and ”
ENG1A
“ ”
ENG4778

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is smart and kind but not a good English teacher (would be good at teaching history instead?).”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization by course type and . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

48/100

“ .”

✍️ Creative Writing Strength

80/100

“If you like fiction and .”

📉 Composition Course Risk

30/100

“DO NOT TAKE ENG5!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she often rambles and doesn't let students talk for more than 30 seconds
  • Funny and quirky and smart.
  • she is very committed to her student's success.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and
  • You only get a good grade if she likes you.
  • This class was extremely easy.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • By far the sweetest professor I have ever had.
  • Absolutely miserable woman.
  • She's really fair.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with rich detail and a stable polarized pattern raise confidence in the mixed portrait.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 510
3 out of 55
2 out of 515
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG1A11 reviews
ENGL1A8 reviews
ENGL53 reviews
1A2 reviews
ENG47822 reviews
Show 20 more courses
ENG52 reviews
ENGL4ABC2 reviews
ENGLENGL2 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
07551 review
ENG01 review
ENG07491 review
ENG07571 review
ENG07811 review
ENG3051 review
ENG41 review
ENG47781 review
ENG4A1 review
ENGL051 review
ENGL07851 review
ENGL17561 review
ENGL48001 review
ENGLI1A1 review
ENGLISH4A1 review
ENGSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1