AI Rate Professor

Public Safety

Roxanne Jacobs-Carpenter

EMC103 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Expect a ; only take if you can self-drive and accept high difficulty.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarized reviewsTest heavyLots of homeworkGet ready to readHands-off instructor
  • and disengaged storyteller.
  • Course is very hard with , and tests.
  • Hands-on teaching is weak for some; TA-led work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Difficulty is maxed out with reported C+ and and homework.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Both reviews rate difficulty at 5 with , and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

and one would not, matching the 50 percent take-again rate.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

High difficulty with C+ and B outcomes suggests grades are not free.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Tags and comments cite lots of , and test weight.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

One student calls her caring and funny; the other says TAs do the work and she mostly tells stories.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

TEST HEAVY tags plus reading and .

Format shift

All assessment evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person EMC103 is described as very hard and polarized: one student finds her caring and funny, another says she sits and tells stories while TAs run class.

Main concern

Little hands-on instruction, outdated reading, and .

What students said

“Bad instructor. All she does is sit in her chair and tell stories while her TA's do all the work.”
EMC103
“Rocky is a her students understand the program.”
EMC103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course is described as , but proctoring details are not specified.

Test heavyReading-focusedHomework-heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize test-heavy assessment without describing proctoring tools or open-book policies.

Test heavyReading-focused
“ ”
EMC103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Bad instructor. All she does is sit in her chair and tell stories while her TA's do all the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization on teaching and high course demand. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Almost no hands on teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“ .”

📚 Heavy Course Load

22/100

“Has you read your book which doesnt even have the right information in it either.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All she does is sit in her chair and tell stories while her TA's do all the work.
  • Rocky is a her students understand the program.
  • She is funny and smart.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • TEST HEAVY

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two sharply conflicting 2018-2019 reviews make the overall picture unstable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EMC1032 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values