AI Rate Professor

Health Sciences

Richard Lehrer

RADT100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative; expect uneven teaching and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnfair graderBoring lecturesEgo-heavyPolarizingPlagiarism accusations
  • and plagiarism accusations even when following the rubric
  • Older reviews split hard between loved first-semester energy and
  • High grades appear possible, but trust and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Most reported grades are A or A-, but unfair and reward.

Online review stresses unfair grading; fairness.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings stay moderate and content is introductory rad tech, not intellectually brutal.

Both online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Tags and comments emphasize participation matters and that skipping means you will not pass.

; in-person also marks attendance mandatory when stated.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

strong warnings about fairness and teaching quality.

Online review is a hard no; in-person evidence is mixed but overall not a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students describe unfair grading, nitpicking, and .

Format shift

Online review is harshest; and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; pain centers on grading fairness and lecture quality, not volume.

Format shift

Sparse workload detail across both formats.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A minority praise knowledge and friendliness, but many describe boredom, ego, disorganization, and .

Format shift

and in-person complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments center on assignments, rubrics, essays, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person RADT100 is polarized: one early student loved his experience and knowledge, while others call the , and unclear.

Main concern

, and inconsistent quality over time.

What students said

“One of the most boring classes I've ever taken in my entire life.”
RADT100
“Disorganized, poor communication, expectations unclear, copied Powerpoints straight from textbook”
RADT100
“I absolutely loved him! He's very knowledgeable and has extensive experience in the X-Ray field.”
RADT100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online RADT100 review is strongly negative: , and plagiarism accusations despite following the rubric.

Main concern

and plagiarism accusations with little trust in feedback.

What students said

“He accuses students of plagiarism and is an unfair grader, even if you do what he asks for in bomb the assignment.”
RADT100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style; assessment pain is fairness and .

Rubric-based assignmentsParticipation heavyUnclear expectations

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; complaints target lectures, PowerPoints, and essay feedback.

Textbook PowerPointsEssay feedback weakUnclear expectations
“ , but a .”
RADT100

Online

Online comments and plagiarism accusations, not camera or lockdown tools.

Unfair assignment gradingPlagiarism accusationsParticipation matters
“He accuses students of plagiarism and is an unfair grader, even if you do what he asks for in bomb the assignment.”
RADT100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! ... He accuses students of plagiarism and is an ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in-person), highlighting polarization and fairness concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Disorganized, poor communication, expectations unclear, copied Powerpoints straight from textbook”

⚖️

24/100

“even if you do what he asks for in bomb the assignment”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“ !”

😴 Class Experience

35/100

“One of the most boring classes I've ever taken in my entire life.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most students were doing other things instead of listening to him get high on his vast ego
  • copied Powerpoints straight from textbook, inaccurate information in lectures
  • He's very knowledgeable and has extensive experience in the X-Ray field

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you do what he asks for in
  • nit-picky on spelling and grammar
  • A

Theme 3

⚠️ Red Flags

  • He accuses students of plagiarism

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, one online and and limited recent volume.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

RADT1004 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values