AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Dana Dickinson

CHLD10 · EDUCATION55 · CHILD10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

unless you only need a low-effort grade and can tolerate a harsh classroom climate.

Best fit · Easy A HunterRude ToneTreats Adults Like KidsVague InstructionsAttendance PunitiveEasy Content Hard Experience
  • Every review rejects taking her again due to attitude, vague instructions, and disrespectful classroom management.
  • Course content and intellectual challenge.
  • Missing class or and note rules create avoidable stress.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple students earned As and called the work easy, even while hating the instructor experience.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Low difficulty ratings and comments about easy content show little intellectual challenge.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

a single miss cut the grade by five percent.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and universal warnings not to enroll.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Grades can land as As despite poor teaching reviews, but criteria feel opaque and graded by few items.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Flashcards and limited graded items keep workload light compared with the stress of the classroom.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students , and elementary-style discipline.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Flashcards, limited graded items, and group work matter more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person child development and education sections criticized for tone, vague directions, and .

Main concern

Attitude and .

What students said

“She's terrible. Her attitude makes it difficult to attend class.”
CHLD10
“Not only does she treat her students like 5 year olds her instructions are often vague.”
CHILD10
“If you just want to sit there all class and get a easy A. Go for it.”
EDUCATION55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize sparse graded items and policy.

Few Graded ItemsFlashcardsGroup Projects

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; grading hinges on few items and class tasks.

Graded By Few ThingsFlashcards
“we had to make flashcards with vocab terms that were due each class”
CHLD10
“ .”
CHLD10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews with highly consistent negative tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She's terrible. Her attitude makes it difficult to attend class.”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“ .”

📝 Easy A Path

82/100

“If you just want to sit there all class and get a easy A. Go for it.”

🚫

12/100

“Missing one class literally dropped my grade 5%”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She reads her lectures straight from a
  • treat her students like 5 year olds
  • Extremely tiring and boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • get a easy A
  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is rude and ignorant
  • hard to talk to
  • threatens to move students for talking

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews, but they are recent, detailed, and highly consistent in negative teaching and zero recommendations.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHLD103 reviews
CHILD101 review
EDUCATION551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2