AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

David Wellman

ATHL41 · ATHL17 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you want a strong coach-style instructor and are ready to participate fully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat CoachDope GuyParticipation MattersGives Good FeedbackWould Take Again
  • Both reviews rate him a perfect 5 and .
  • , and participation more than academic structure.
  • Difficulty is high, yet both reported A or A- with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students earned A or A- despite high difficulty ratings, so grades reward effort more than .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings of 4 and 5 signal a demanding physical or athletic course.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory with participation emphasized.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Perfect quality scores and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Strong grades with and , but sample is tiny.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Group projects and participation matter, but comments do not detail weekly load.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students call him a dope guy and great coach with , though detail is sparse.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Tags mention participation and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but very short praise for coaching and feedback.

Main concern

Very little detail on workload structure or assessments beyond participation.

What students said

“Hes a dope guy”
ATHL17
“Great Coach”
ATHL41

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment signals focus on participation and projects.

Participation-basedGroup projects

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No explicit exam format is described for in-person athletics sections.

Participation-basedGroup projects
“ ”
ATHL17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hes a dope guy”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 brief in-person reviews, highlighting coach praise and sparse detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Great Coach”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“Yes”

🏃 Participation Focus

18/100

“Participation matters”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hes a dope guy
  • Great Coach

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 5
  • A-
  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two very short reviews limit reliability despite perfect quality scores.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ATHL171 review
ATHL411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values