AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Maxine Freitas

EQSCI25 · AGRI10 · EQU100 · EQISCI102B · EQUINESCIENCE · EQSCI100 · EQSCI2220 · EQSCI6674 · EQSCI101 · EQSCI80 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if she is the only option for a required equine course and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFlaky and InconsistentMandatory Field TripsShort FusePassionate but UnpreparedMovie-Heavy Lectures
  • some call her knowledgeable and flexible, many call her flaky and unprepared.
  • Attendance and field trips are effectively required, yet she is often late or absent herself.
  • Expectations and , so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some say she grades easily and gives easy tests, but others report unreasonable expectations and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

and high difficulty ratings depending on the course.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Field trips and class attendance are required, and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

A few praise her passion, but many explicitly say avoid her due to flakiness, movies instead of teaching, and a short fuse.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

One student notes easy grading, yet unclear expectations make grades feel unpredictable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Field trips and heavy material for tests add load, while some courses feel movie-light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Knowledge and passion appear at times, but flakiness, dated materials, and snapping at students dominate.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

58/100

Tests and field-trip essay questions drive .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person equine and ag classes mix field trips and movies with uneven structure; passion shows for hard workers but flakiness and short temper dominate many reviews.

Main concern

and field-trip content while teaching feels low priority and inconsistent.

What students said

“Lots of field trips with though”
EQSCI80
“ but hers isn't. She is hands down the flakiest teacher I have ever had.”
EQISCI102B
“It was hard to know what she expected of us and there was way too much material covered for the tests.”
EQSCI100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often cover more than expected, and .

Unclear Test ContentField-Trip Essay QuestionsEasy Tests (Some Courses)

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests can feel overloaded and poorly scoped; field-trip .

Unclear Test ContentField-Trip Essay Questions
“there was way too much material covered for the tests. It was hard to know what we would actually be tested on.”
EQSCI100
“She uses information from and doesn't allow anyone who wasn't on the field trip to even attempt the essay question.”
EQSCI25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but hers isn't. She is hands down the flakiest teacher I have ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2018, highlighting flakiness, attendance, and polarizing teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Reliability

38/100

“Teaching is low priority for her. Also, the class was way too hard with unreasonable expectations.”

🚫 Recommendation Tone

32/100

“ if possible!”

📅

18/100

“Lots of field trips with though”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She showed a movie on the first day of class instead of actually teaching anything.
  • Drifts from subject to subject and uses very dated material.
  • Great teacher. Really passionate and knowledgeable about her field.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She did grade easily, but was flaky.
  • and homework, and yet I still learned her subject.
  • the class was way too hard with unreasonable expectations.

Theme 3

😤 About Temperament

  • her fuse is pretty short so expect to get snapped at a few times.
  • Seems to regard students as an inconvenience
  • Totally stuck up and worthless.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

and low grade reporting; opinions are consistent on flakiness but split on overall quality.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

EQSCI252 reviews
AGRI101 review
EQISCI102B1 review
EQSCI1001 review
EQSCI1011 review
Show 5 more courses
EQSCI22201 review
EQSCI66741 review
EQSCI801 review
EQU1001 review
EQUINESCIENCE1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1