AI Rate Professor

Art

Deborah Kirklin

ART14B · 7A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a light studio load and , but expect oils-only focus and some wasted class time.

Best fit · Easy A HunterClear feedbackSoft spokenEasy graderOils-only biasWastes class time
  • and friendly boundaries for studio work
  • teaching time use
  • and she favors oils over acrylics

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Few assignments and if you complete the work.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty reports range from very easy to moderately hard depending on the studio course.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; the other would not due to oils bias and wasted time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Students report few assignments and an easy path to a good grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Not many assignments and no textbooks required.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and respect for some, but others cite unnecessary lectures and oils-only preference.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Studio work and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

; one student praised clear feedback while another found her oils-only and time-wasting but still an easy A.

Main concern

She may look down on acrylic users and spend class time on unnecessary lectures.

What students said

“Clear and concise direction, respectful and useful constructive criticism, friendly but with .”
7A
“She , so it is easy to get a good grade.”
ART14B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She , so it is easy to get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2017-2018; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Clear and concise direction, respectful and useful constructive criticism, friendly but with .”

📈 Easy Grades

78/100

“She , so it is easy to get a good grade.”

🎨 Studio Bias

40/100

“She only teaches/demonstrates in oils and not acrylics. She looks down upon students that don't use oils.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Clear and concise direction, respectful and useful constructive criticism
  • She also wastes class time by talking and giving unnecessary lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She , so it is easy to get a good grade
  • It was difficult to get much work done in this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews with mixed tone and limited grade detail reduce confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

7A1 review
ART14B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1