AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lisa Nussdorfer

MATH150B · MATH25 · MATH150A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you already handle math independently; weaker students may need a clearer lecturer.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsPop QuizzesExtra CreditConfusing LecturesStudent-Interest Varies
  • some call her fun and and full of mistakes.
  • Lower-level MATH25 feedback is warmer; MATH150B and 155 feedback is much more critical.
  • Expect , and uneven lecture organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

, but higher-level sections demand real struggle and self-study.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

MATH25 feels approachable, while 150B/155 feel fast and confusing.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

; other reviews do not emphasize strict attendance.

and only in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strong praise and strong rejection both appear, so and course level.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , but confusion still hurts performance for many.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

one harsh review, while other sections focus on outlines and quizzes.

Format shift

Workload comments are all in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Caring personality helps some students, but , and errors.

Format shift

Teaching quality evidence is all in-person and mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Pop quizzes, homework, outlines, and at least one section.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and and error-prone depending on course level.

Main concern

Several students say she skips steps, makes lecture mistakes, and .

What students said

“She skips steps, does not go into depth, and she makes soo many mistakes in her lesions that you don't know what you are supposed to do.”
MATH150B
“ , because she wants you to focus more on actually learning the material rather than stressing about a .”
MATH25
“The most awful math teacher I have ever had. and doesn't even know how to do math.”
155

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams range from relatively easy tests in MATH25 to standard high-stakes math assessment with pop quizzes.

Pop QuizzesEasy Tests In Some SectionsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and, in MATH25, easier tests aimed at learning over stress.

Pop QuizzesEasy Tests In Some SectionsExtra Credit
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH150A
“ , because she wants you to focus more on actually learning the material rather than stressing about a .”
MATH25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as a person. However her teaching skills are sub-par.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting split teaching quality by course level. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Consistency

46/100

“She skips steps, does not go into depth, and she makes soo many mistakes in her lesions that you don't know what you are supposed to do.”

❤️ Student Care

70/100

“It's refreshing to have a professor that actually takes an interest in her students.”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

48/100

“If you're already a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are boring.
  • .
  • Lisa is a very fun math teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She assigns way too much hw
  • She cares and class is fun

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risks

  • Easily distracted and technologically inept.
  • I learned more from the book.
  • Teaching style is fast and requires two pots of coffee to keep up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but opinions diverge sharply by course level, lowering certainty.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH150B2 reviews
MATH252 reviews
1551 review
MATH150A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1