AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Matthew Fisher

PHIL5 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want an engaging philosophy intro and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting LecturesHard TestsEasy EssaysLots of HomeworkGet Ready to Read
  • Lectures are interesting and eventually help students grasp the material
  • while
  • Expect , and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and one student earned an A, but .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content can feel freshman-friendly, yet reading, homework, and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory with no flexibility language.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and praise interesting lectures despite annoyances.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but as hard and sometimes punitive.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Tags and comments emphasize lots of homework and getting ready to read.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students find his lectures interesting and helpful after adapting, though humor can annoy.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Course mixes hard tests or quizzes with essays that students find easier to ace.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PHIL5 students find him interesting and adaptable as a lecturer, but and .

Main concern

and are not released for review.

What students said

“ and some are set up for you to fail (he says this in class).”
PHIL5
“It's really , though.”
PHIL5
“He was by far one of the most interesting professors I had.”
PHIL5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and quizzes are the stricter side of assessment, with .

Hard testsQuizzes without released answer keysEssay-friendly component

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and limited quiz review support, with no proctoring software mentioned.

Hard testsQuiz answer keys not releasedEasy-to-ace essays
“ and some are set up for you to fail (he says this in class).”
PHIL5
“he only went over solutions for a quiz once with the class and did not release for review.”
PHIL5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was by far one of the most interesting professors I had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🧠 Lecture Style

72/100

“His lecture style at first may seem intimidating, but it's easy to adapt to, and it actually helped with comprehending the material.”

📝

58/100

“It's really , though.”

📚 Workload

36/100

“Get ready to read, LOTS OF HOMEWORK”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He thinks he is hilarious, but he's slightly annoying.
  • He was by far one of the most interesting professors I had.
  • His lecture style at first may seem intimidating, but it's easy to adapt to.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and some are set up for you to fail.
  • It's really , though.
  • he only went over solutions for a quiz once with the class and did not release for review.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two same-course in-person reviews from 2016 provide limited but consistent detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL52 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values