AI Rate Professor

Agriculture Natl Resources

Courtney Dellelo

PLANTSCI20 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and dense lectures in an intro plant science course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLong LecturesHeavy HomeworkToo Advanced for IntroTiring Class
  • Lectures felt long and tiring, with the student nodding off.
  • Lots of homework and high attention to detail are required.
  • Course felt too advanced for an intro and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Student earned a C in a difficult course with lots of .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Difficulty rated 4 and content felt too advanced for an intro class.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

described.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Student would not take her again after tiring lectures and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Student received a C and described demanding detail-focused work without leniency signals.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Review explicitly warns about lots of homework and attention to detail.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Lectures described as long and tiring with the student falling asleep; only rated as ok.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single in-person PLANTSCI20 review calls her only an ok teacher with long tiring lectures, lots of homework, and content too advanced for intro.

Main concern

and lectures that put students to sleep.

What students said

“Ok teacher lectures were long and tiring found myself falling asleep or nodding off at times. Lots of , and specific attention to detail.”
PLANTSCI20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

“Felt the class was a little bit too advanced for an intro.”
PLANTSCI20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ok teacher lectures were long and tiring found myself falling asleep or nodding off at times. Lots of , and specific attention to detail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting lecture fatigue and . Credibility rating: Low.

😴 Lecture Energy

30/100

“lectures were long and tiring found myself falling asleep or nodding off at times”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“Lots of , and specific attention to detail”

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“Felt the class was a little bit too advanced for an intro.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were long and tiring
  • found myself falling asleep or nodding off at times
  • Ok teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of
  • specific attention to detail
  • a little bit too advanced for an intro

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2016 review with but no corroborating sample reduces reliability.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PLANTSCI201 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values