AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Windsor Green

CS7011A · FONTMANAGEMENT · CS5011B · CIS5417 · CS17511 · CIS73 · CIS7011A · PHOTOSHOP · CIS7321 · 7011A · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

unless you must—students repeatedly say you will teach yourself from books and YouTube.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes not teachStrict unclear gradingPoor communicationBook-and-video reliantAvoid if possible
  • Most students say she relies on books and third-party videos instead of teaching.
  • , and hard to interpret from vague instructions.
  • Online and a few older positive outliers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students report strict, picky grading and when work is submitted.

and confusion more than the mixed older in-person set.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content itself is not advanced, but and long tedious assignments make the experience harder than it should be.

Both formats report tedious work; online adds more organizational chaos.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; most online reviews do not discuss attendance.

; online reviews rarely address it.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The dominant message across recent reviews is do not take her, with .

Online reviews are almost uniformly negative; a few older in-person comments are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students describe strict grading, wrong file-format disputes, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Assignments are long, detailed, and tedious, sometimes requiring extra paid CDs beyond the textbook.

Format shift

Both formats mention tedious work; online also flags extra material costs.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Core complaint is that she does not teach and leaves students to books, Lynda videos, or YouTube.

Format shift

Online and in-person recent reviews agree; a .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Courses appear assignment-heavy with project submissions and little praise for .

Format shift

Online ; exams are not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

know how to teach or prepares poorly, with a couple older positive notes.

Main concern

Slow class pace and weak teaching preparation.

What students said

“ friend that does her peer reviews because as a student I can tell you that she doesn't teach.”
7011A
“I can't believe she's teaching.”
CIS73
“She's great. I love her Photoshop class.”
CIS5417

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw the harshest feedback for no real teaching, bad communication, expensive materials, and .

Main concern

Vague assignments, poor email replies, and .

What students said

“ .”
CIS7011A
“doesn't actually teach, her website had multiple errors which took her weeks to fix”
CS5011B
“I recommend anyone wanting to learn photoshop just use youtube you will learn more.”
9068

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctored exams; the .

Assignment-based gradingUnclear instructionsStrict rubric pickiness

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize weak teaching and non-specific instructions more than a .

Non-specific instructionsTedious assignments
“Has very non-specific instructions and then marks you down for things that were not included in the instructions.”
CIS73

Online

Online evidence centers on strict project grading and .

Strict assignment gradingVague written instructionsPoor email clarification
“She's a .”
CS5011B
“ feel you can have an email conversation with.”
CS7011A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (7 online, 8 in person), , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“she doesn't teach. Only out for a paycheck.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ ”

⚖️

22/100

“Has very non-specific instructions and then marks you down for things that were not included in the instructions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • rely on a book to do it for her
  • doesn't actually teach
  • I can't believe she's teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very strict. Unhelpful and .
  • She's a .
  • marks you down for things that were not included in the instructions.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • refuse communication
  • Short two sentence or so . Didn't really answer the questions.
  • how horrible of communication she has

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across online and and detailed, give a consistent warning despite a few older positives.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CIS733 reviews
CS5011B2 reviews
CS7011A2 reviews
7011A1 review
90681 review
Show 6 more courses
CIS54171 review
CIS7011A1 review
CIS73211 review
CS175111 review
FONTMANAGEMENT1 review
PHOTOSHOP1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Pass 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1