AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Robert Guinn

CHEM42 · CHEM60 · CHEMISTRY110 · CHEM1A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will work hard, attend office hours, and want a solid chem instructor who improves with experience.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear when engagedMonotone deliveryOffice hours helpfulHard chemistry examsImproves over semester
  • Chemistry is inherently hard; students who use office hours and .
  • Reviews split between clear, funny, up-to-date lectures and .
  • ; success depends on effort and seeking help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students stress that chemistry demands real work, with and As.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content is hard regardless of instructor; pacing and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and lab courses.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Strong for students who engage and use office hours; weaker for those put off by monotone delivery or harsh tests.

Mixed .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

and error-prone; others get As and Bs with effort, so outcomes feel mixed but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students say you must study and do real work, with less busywork than some professors but no featherlight load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Praised as , and current by supporters; called monotone and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and as the main evaluation drivers.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and ; others cite monotone delivery and hard, harshly graded tests.

Main concern

and uneven clarity, especially early-semester or lab sections.

What students said

“ newest info in chem”
CHEM1A
“he'll ”
CHEM42
“ and he grades harshly.”
CHEM42
“Monotone voice makes it hard to pay attention and seems as though he doesnt want to be there.”
CHEM60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard with some office-hour hints; reviews .

Hard testsExam hints in office hoursHarsh grading reported

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; , and some students report harsh grading.

Hard examsOffice hour exam hintsHarsh grading
“he'll ”
CHEM42
“ and he grades harshly.”
CHEM42
“If you think Chem will be an easy class you are just crazy-IT'S CHEM! You WILL have to do work!”
CHEM1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great class if you want to learn chem.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person chemistry reviews, balancing praise and criticism. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧪 Teaching Clarity

58/100

“ newest info in chem, smart & enjoys what he teaches.”

📝

45/100

“ and he grades harshly.”

😊 Personality Split

55/100

“Mid-sememster he relaxes, jokes & plain fun.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are straightforward and he tells you what you need to know on the tests
  • he's a great teacher, very funny!
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • IT'S CHEM! You WILL have to do work!
  • and he grades harshly.
  • he'll

Theme 3

🎙️ About Delivery

  • Monotone voice makes it hard to pay attention
  • It's just the face.
  • students mostly complain about his voice and facial expression

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews from 2014-2016 show mixed but coherent themes; modest sample and older dates keep credibility medium.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM424 reviews
CHEM1A2 reviews
CHEM602 reviews
CHEMISTRY1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values