AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Sharon Lieberman

PSYCHOLOGY · PSYC4 · PSYCH3370 · PSYCH5 · PSY4 · PSYCH4 · PSCHY1A · CHILD · PSYCH35 · PSYCH7376 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a caring psych professor with and speakers, and can tolerate some disorganization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of Extra CreditDisorganized But CaringGuest SpeakersTake-Home TestsPassionate Therapist-Prof
  • Caring and and interesting guest speakers.
  • Disorganization and dry lectures are the main recurring complaints.
  • and book-based exams if you do the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and easy grader comments make good grades common with steady work.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Material can be interesting and tests sometimes challenging, but many call content and pace manageable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

; older comments emphasize coming to class to succeed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Strong recent praise and many fans of speakers and care; a and chaos.

All evidence from in-person reviews; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and take-home options soften grading.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Homework and , but many say work is not difficult if you stay on top of it.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Passionate and caring with excellent speakers; lectures often called boring or disorganized.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of take-home tests, book-based multiple choice, group projects, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person psych and child development lectures with guest speakers, , and mixed clarity on organization.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Sharon was a delight. She cared about her subject and cared about her students.”
PSY4
“She is the most boring lecturer EVER.”
PSYCH5
“offers a TON of opportunities. , but it is easy to get a good grade.”
PSYCH4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, with , making exams relatively student-friendly.

Take-home testsOpen-book style reading focusPartner testsStudy from lecture slides and chaptersExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; multiple choice often from the book; partner tests reported.

Take-home testsBook-based MCPartner testsFinal may be in classExtra credit
“ , but if you review her lecture slides & read the chapter the .”
PSYCH3370
“Some of the .”
PSYCH4
“ .”
PSYCH35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She cared about her subject and cared about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 in-person psychology reviews, highlighting care, , speakers, and disorganization. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Support

88/100

“She is very SUPPORTED & FUNNY too!”

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She is the most boring lecturer EVER.”

📗 Easy Grade Path

78/100

“ , but it is easy to get a good grade.”

🎤 Guest Speakers

85/100

“Second half INCREDIBLY AWESOME SPEAKERS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was always the perfect model of a therapist turned professor
  • passionate about the topic and about teaching/learning

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • TON of opportunities
  • and she takes the questions directly from the reading
  • Easy to get an A though.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • she was so
  • spent 30 minutes trying to figure out the PowerPoint presentation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews over many years with ; includes recent 2025 feedback.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH49 reviews
PSYCH56 reviews
PSYCH353 reviews
PSY42 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CHILD1 review
PSCHY1A1 review
PSYC41 review
PSYCH33701 review
PSYCH73761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values