AI Rate Professor

Physics

Neil Wheeler

PHYS20 · PHYS2020L · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; you will likely learn physics on your own from the book and posted slides.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear LecturerReads From SlidesHarsh Lab GraderSelf-Study RequiredAvoid If Possible
  • Students must self-teach because and slide-driven
  • but little
  • Nearly every review urges avoiding him despite him being a

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Challenging tests and with little .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Physics content plus unclear lectures make the material without heavy self-study.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance rules are rarely described; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

if possible because teaching quality is very low.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Partial credit exists on tests, but as harsh and as unforgiving.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Homework answers are posted online, but self-study and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say , and fails to show how to solve problems.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and homework rather than one dominant mode.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person physics lectures feel dull and ; students rely on posted PowerPoints and self-study while .

Main concern

Unclear explanations and .

What students said

“I have had to learn the course on my own. Avoid if possible.”
PHYS20
“He reads straight from his power points (which are taken from the ”
PHYS2020L
“ , so be specific & detailed about EVERYTHING.”
PHYS20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as somewhat challenging with partial credit but little support.

Challenging TestsPartial CreditLimited Extra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; partial credit is given but is limited.

Challenging TestsPartial Credit
“Yes, he does give partial credit but the .”
PHYS20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Neil is a nice guy but his teaching sucks. He hardly ever uses the ?), and is terrible at explaining. AVOID if possible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting unclear lectures and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Wheeler is not the ideal physics teacher in any way. , and dull.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ .”

🔬

28/100

“ , so be specific & detailed about EVERYTHING.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He reads straight off the
  • and the powerpoints are taken from the book
  • I found it v difficult to follow along with what he says during his lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the
  • I wish that he would give more points

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Nice person!
  • Mr. Wheeler is a nice guy, but he is not cut out to be a teacher
  • He's a decent guy, but I found it very difficult to learn from him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed, consistent negative reviews from 2015 give a but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHYS205 reviews
PHYS2020L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values