AI Rate Professor

English

Cynthia Battershall

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLISH1A · ENGLISH · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you want intense essay practice and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderUnclear expectationsHeavy writing loadOdd classroom habitsEssay structure help
  • , and unpredictable on topics and grades.
  • and vague instructions.
  • A minority learned solid thesis and MLA skills by using early drafts for feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and vague standards make high grades difficult even with major effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is traditional composition, but workload and English.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Students who attend every class and show effort fare better; flexibility is not strongly advertised.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Frequent worst-teacher and writing-skill praise.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Repeated reports of , and opinion-based paper scores.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of writing, many assignments, and draft rewrites create an overwhelming load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some teach thesis and MLA well, but .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades hinge mainly on a few essays and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Polarizing English 1A: some credit stronger writing and A grades with effort; , and eccentric behavior.

Main concern

Unclear shifting expectations and .

What students said

“even if you put a lot of hard effort into an c. she is the ”
ENG1A
“Ive had to completely rewrite an because she suddenly decided my topic was to easy”
ENGL1A
“the work assigned is overwhelming...shes a little off the wall...theres alot of writing”
ENGLISH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-centered; .

Essay-basedDraft feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Grades based largely on essays with harsh paper standards; .

Essay-basedHarsh paper grading
“grades based off of , and grades very harshly.”
ENG1A
“if you turn them in to her early so you can ammend them.”
ENGLISH1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this teacher is for sure one of the . even if you put a lot of hard effort into an c.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 and mixed writing-skill outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

22/100

“she is the , and hands back essays months after you turn them in.”

📉 Recommendation

30/100

“This teacher is probably the !”

✍️ Writing Skills Upside

55/100

“she is very good at teaching how to shape a thesis and essays. I learned how to write much better”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is horrible. Unclear. Dramatic. Annoying.
  • she was always bouncing around not sticking to any one subject.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is so hard!!
  • Gives vague instructions and
  • As lon as you go to every class and show effort you will get a good grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Issues

  • shes allergic to perfume
  • complain about the fumes that nobody else could smell
  • Gets mad if you gel your hair because she hates the fumes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews with strong thematic consistency, but most are old (2004-2007) with limited recent detail.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGLISH1A7 reviews
ENG1A6 reviews
ENGLISH3 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values