AI Rate Professor

Consumer Family Studies

Katie Clark

FNTA · FNDT10 · FDNT10 · FDNT162 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Solid choice for online nutrition if you stay on the weekly schedule and study for timed quizzes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Online StructureOpen Book TestsWeekly QuizzesHelpful When ResponsiveMixed Organization
  • Many students , and useful nutrition content.
  • some get fast email help, others report silence.
  • Workload is steady weekly quizzes and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Open-book quizzes and with consistent effort.

Online evidence is mixed on support; most easy-grade comments come from in-person-tagged reviews that describe online sections.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Nutrition has chemistry depth, but most call the class manageable if you keep up weekly.

Both formats describe similar content difficulty; online has only two official reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

Course is largely asynchronous online weekly work; .

Flexibility is clearest in online-style comments across tags; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and learning, tempered by help and professionalism complaints.

Online pair is split; broader positive tilt comes from the larger in-person-tagged set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

open-book work, though some find quizzes tricky.

Format shift

Online and in-person-tagged comments both lean fair with occasional tough quiz notes.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and projects; doable if you stay current each week.

Format shift

Weekly cadence is consistent across online-focused comments in both format tags.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and ; a minority report poor help or unprofessional classroom behavior.

Format shift

Online official reviews are split; larger in-person-tagged pool is mostly positive about online delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Weekly quizzes and , and occasional group work.

Format shift

Similar assessment mix appears in both formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most tagged in-person reviews actually describe online nutrition sections as , and informative, with a minority calling tests tricky or the instructor unprofessional.

Main concern

and uneven help or classroom professionalism for some students.

What students said

“The and the .”
FDNT10
“Everything is open book. The class isn't difficult if you are committed.”
FDNT10
“ ”
FDNT10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and earned an A, another withdrew after little help and a failing trajectory.

Main concern

Support can feel limited when you fall behind.

What students said

“It is not an easy class as it is chemistry, but it is very easy to know what to do and what is expected of you.”
FDNT10
“She hardly provides help, tried asking for help several times, and yet, either refused to help or was not quick enough.”
FDNT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students repeatedly describe open-book quizzes and tests tied to textbook and lectures.

Open BookWeekly QuizzesTimed TestsTextbook Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Many in-person-tagged reviews describing online sections report open-book tests and weekly quizzes based on readings and lectures.

Open BookWeekly QuizzesTimed QuizzesExtra Credit
“The and the .”
FDNT10
“There's a and a . Everything is open book.”
FDNT10
“The quizzes and and lectures and there was an opportunity for .”
FDNT162

Online

Limited official online comments do not fully detail proctoring; and chemistry-level content.

Clear Weekly WorkChemistry Content
“The work is the same every week and is very informative.”
FDNT10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Katie is an awesome teacher for an online class. and as long as you keep up with the lectures you're fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (2 online, 18 , and mixed support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ but doable, and test are not easy but are a breez if you have completed the weeks assignments.”

📘

82/100

“Tests and quizes not bad, all open book. Easy and fun, learned a lot.”

⚠️ Support Gaps

40/100

“She hardly provides help, tried asking for help several times, and yet, either refused to help or was not quick enough to help me salvage my grade.”

👍 Recommendation

70/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and clear.
  • so fast she is helpful and .
  • matter of fact

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The .
  • some of the
  • the class takes some work to get an A in.

Theme 3

🖥️ About Online Experience

  • This online class was great! Very informative and clear.
  • Unorganized class. No response from instructor when asking questions.
  • Everything is open book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews with consistent open-book and weekly-work themes, but and only two are officially online.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FDNT1017 reviews
FDNT1621 review
FNDT101 review
FNTA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1