AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

MA Gonzales

CHEM60 · CHEM604347 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already know chemistry well and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared lecturesAttitude issuesStudents self-teachNew instructorConfusing explanations
  • Multiple reviews describe forgotten lecture steps and awkward pauses while she regains her place.
  • Students report attitude when asked questions and .
  • She was new and may improve, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Course is hard and students must self-teach; a B is reported but success depends on prior knowledge and outside help.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content plus unclear lectures make the class feel harder than it needs to be.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

as evidence of flexible options.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most reviews , and self-teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; one student earned a B while still criticizing instruction quality.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is not the main complaint; confusion in lecture drives the negative experience.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students describe forgotten lectures, complicated answers, and needing tutors to learn the material.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus on .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CHEM60 feels disorganized; lectures stall and and tutors.

Main concern

and defensive responses to questions force self-teaching.

What students said

“Multiple times during lecture, she would forget what she was doing & we had to sit there awkwardly waiting until she figured it out.”
CHEM60
“ . I don’t recommend.”
CHEM60
“she did not have a good knowledge of the class, text, or labs.”
CHEM604347

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Multiple times during lecture, she would forget what she was doing & we had to sit there awkwardly waiting until she figured it out (and sometimes have to figure it out for her).”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture quality and self-teaching needs. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Multiple times during lecture, she would forget what she was doing & we had to sit there awkwardly waiting until she figured it out.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ . I don’t recommend.”

📚

30/100

“When you ask questions, she gets an attitude & over complicates things.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Sometimes during lecture she doesn't exactly know the answer to a question you may have but will figure it out for you.
  • she did not have a good knowledge of the class, text, or labs.
  • When you ask questions, she gets an attitude, over complicates things & acts like a child.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I came into the class with prior chemistry knowledge so it made it a little easier for me.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Preparedness

  • She was just dropped in the class a few weeks before it started.
  • She might be better after a few classes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews from mid-2014 are detailed and directionally consistent, but the sample is small and two comments are near-duplicates.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM603 reviews
CHEM6043471 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values