AI Rate Professor

Public Safety

Curtis Newsom

FIRE7890 · FIRE7173 · FIRE76 · FIRE74 · FIRE73 · FIRE71 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

who will show up ready to learn.

Best fit · Effort For RewardReal Fire Service ExperienceCareer MentorshipClear LecturesMinimal HomeworkExpects Serious Students
  • Students overwhelmingly call him one of the
  • He brings real career experience and practical answers into class
  • Classes are not free rides; and effort

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Grades seem attainable with engagement, but he expects real effort and seriousness rather than .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Material is accessible when you pay attention, with moderate difficulty and strong real-world framing.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

He clearly expects students to show up and stay as optional.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Nearly every review is glowing and frames him as a top fire-service instructor and mentor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

; students focus on learning and career value over grade anxiety.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

as minimal while class time carries most of the learning.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

, and highly helpful with deep professional fire-service knowledge.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize lectures and career learning more than specific exam-heavy or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person fire courses are praised for clear teaching, real field stories, career help, and .

Main concern

Not ideal if you plan to waste class time or treat the course as a joke.

What students said

“One of the and I still go to him for questions about everything”
FIRE74
“His classes are by no means a joke and he does not appreciate people that are there to waste his or others time”
FIRE71
“ .”
FIRE7173

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he is my idol! he definitly knows his stuff”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person fire-service reviews, highlighting teaching excellence and career value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

95/100

“his teaching is brilliant and he is a wonderful source to learn knowledge of fire terminology and systems from.”

🔥 Real-World Value

94/100

“brought real life experience on the job into all of his lessons”

👍 Recommendation

96/100

“If you really want to learn about the fire service, and not .”

📚 Workload

78/100

“Clear and to the point and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really good teacher, knows all about the profession and has many stories
  • Very funny, and helpful
  • Curt is knows his material, and how to get it across to the students

Theme 2

🚒 About Career Mentorship

  • I still go to him for questions about everything
  • If you're lucky enough to get a job in the fire service you'll be gald you learned from Curt

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • AWESOME GUY!
  • He cares about his students, but expects you to do what your supposed to
  • The best

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

, though sample size is modest and mostly older.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FIRE713 reviews
FIRE743 reviews
FIRE71731 review
FIRE731 review
FIRE761 review
Show 1 more courses
FIRE78901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values