AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

R Caricato

APTECH56 · APTEC2736 · APTECH46 · APTEC56 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid if you need a patient intro instructor; if you already handle tools well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProImpatientCondescendingHands-on takeoverKnowledgeable but harshAutoCAD stress
  • Students repeatedly call him impatient and demeaning when they ask basic questions
  • He is seen as knowledgeable and a , but delivery is harsh
  • Classroom atmosphere makes students dread asking for help

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate and one student calls him a , but the climate is not grade-friendly support.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content difficulty looks moderate; the .

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available reviews.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most reviews warn students to stay away due to impatience and demeaning interactions, despite knowledge.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student calls him a straight and ; overall tone is firm rather than generous.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Workload

Light

60/100

Reviews focus more on .

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students describe rude, impatient, and condescending instruction that blocks learning.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Comments center on hands-on AutoCAD practice and .

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person AutoCAD and applied tech reviews emphasize impatience and condescension, with some credit for knowledge and .

Main concern

Students feel demeaned for basic questions and lose hands-on learning when he takes over the mouse.

What students said

“Rude, short, impatient, and condescending are the first words to come to mind”
APTECH46
“very impatient. kinda yells at you when you do something wrong”
APTEC2736
“ , but very impatient”
APTECH56

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize lab interaction and .

“he's a and a fair instructor”
APTEC2736

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rude, short, impatient, and condescending are the first words to come to mind. Makes students feel like idiots for asking basic, reasonable questions about AutoCAD.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 In person reviews, highlighting impatience and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Climate

28/100

“Tends to demean students who ask any questions”

🚫 Recommendation

24/100

“Stay away!”

🧠 Knowledge vs Delivery

55/100

“ , but very impatient”

Theme 1

😠 About Classroom Tone

  • Rude, short, impatient, and condescending
  • kinda yells at you when you do something wrong
  • Never directly answered questions without first sighing, rolling his eyes

Theme 2

🛠️ About Learning Style

  • Takes the mouse out of students hands when he's frustrated and does it himself, horrible way to learn
  • i personally don't like working when he's there
  • Needs to work on delivery

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only four in-person reviews over several years consistently criticize impatience, but the sample is small and aging.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

APTEC27361 review
APTEC561 review
APTECH461 review
APTECH561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values