AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Kelley Fruchey

ENG101B · HUMANITIES410 · HUM · OLDNNEWTEST · HUM104 · HUMAN5 · OLDNEWTEST · OLDTESTAMENT · HUMAN100 · HUMAN104 · HUMAN10 · HUMAN1012 · PHIL3 · HUM101 · HUMANITIES101 · HUMANITIES · HUM102 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a demanding, discussion-driven humanities class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing PassionHarsh GraderHeavy Reading LoadInvested When You EngageScattered Organization
  • Students split sharply between calling her life-changing and .
  • and papers dominate; and harsh.
  • Passionate, discussion-heavy classes reward engaged students who want critical thinking.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Harsh essay grading and and matching her narrow expectations, not just effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Content is interesting with lots of discussion, but pace, volume of reading, and critical writing keep it from feeling easy.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews almost never spell out an , so .

All evidence is from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Passionate fans call her life-changing while , so fit depends on tolerance for intensity and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several students and a feeling that she wants narrow answers matching her views.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reports of 100-200 pages of and discussion make the load heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

When engaged she is inspiring and clear; critics .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Papers, reading, and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person humanities and writing classes feel intense and discussion-rich; many praise her passion while , and disorganization.

Main concern

and heavy nightly reading can tank grades even when she seems nice in class.

What students said

“Though her course may be challenging, she by far has taught me more about writing and critical thinking than any other english teacher I have ever had.”
ENG101B
“very very very harsh grader (my essay grades pulled my class grade down to a C from an A)”
HUMAN10
“ and i would have failed if she implimented them.. Great teacher, have fun in class, !”
HUMANITIES101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests may be skipped if the class is lively, but when given they are described as extremely hard; essays carry heavy weight.

Sometimes Omits TestsHard Tests When GivenEssay Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

an active class, but implemented tests are super hard and essays are graded harshly.

Optional or Omitted TestsSuper Hard TestsHarsh Essay Grading
“if she likes the class, she will ommit the tests, if she doesnt .GOOD LUCK!, ”
HUMANITIES101
“she gave very broad descriptions for what she wanted in the essay topics, but expected very very narrow answers”
HUMAN10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Though her course may be challenging, she by far has taught me more about writing and critical thinking than any other english teacher I have ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 in-person reviews spanning 2004-2014, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🔥 Polarizing Passion

58/100

“If you want to become excited about a ”

📉

28/100

“very very very harsh grader (my essay grades pulled my class grade down to a C from an A)”

📚

30/100

“there was about 100-200 pgs of ”

⚖️ Split Recommendation

52/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is personally invested in each of her students
  • She is not the easiest teacher Ive ever taken, she really wants you to learn something
  • she knows her topic well and enjoys teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If

Theme 3

💔 About Negative Experiences

  • , and thinks the world of herself
  • A Bull**** teacher! The
  • suck suck suck suck suck.... circumstances

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

22 mostly older in-person reviews with polarized but detailed comments; limited grade data and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HUMAN102 reviews
HUMANITIES2 reviews
OLDTESTAMENT2 reviews
PHIL32 reviews
1021 review
Show 13 more courses
ENG101B1 review
HUM1 review
HUM1011 review
HUM1021 review
HUM1041 review
HUMAN1001 review
HUMAN10121 review
HUMAN1041 review
HUMAN51 review
HUMANITIES1011 review
HUMANITIES4101 review
OLDNEWTEST1 review
OLDNNEWTEST1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values