AI Rate Professor

English

Katherine Plank

ENGLISH5 · ENGL5 · ENG5 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel at independent argumentative writing and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionPersonal Life Over ContentPolarizing Discussion StyleEasy Exams ClaimedLow Recommendation
  • Most reviews slam clarity and say little real teaching happens.
  • A if already strong in English or philosophy.
  • One student reports .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

and she wants students to do well, but weak teaching and mixed grades make an A unreliable without independent skill.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, yet unclear instruction raises the effective challenge for many.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Four of six reviews are and claims of no learning.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

One positive review says exams are easy and she wants students to succeed; .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; class centers on readings, debates, and exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and off-topic personal talk.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mentions of debates plus easy exams suggest mixed discussion and testing without a .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ENG5 reviews are mostly negative on teaching clarity, with a couple praising debate energy and easy exams for self-directed students.

Main concern

and weak explicit instruction for students without prior Eng/Phil strength.

What students said

“ . Doesn't know what she's doing. Has no clarity in anything.”
ENG5
“She talks about her personal life more then she actually teaches you something.”
ENGL5
“classes consist of intriguing debates and the .”
ENG5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Limited comments call exams really easy while expecting argument techniques without much explicit teaching.

Easy ExamsDiscussion FocusArgument Techniques Expected

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments that mention exams call them easy; .

Easy Exams
“the . she wants you to do well!”
ENG5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Doesn't know what she's doing. Has no clarity in anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting clarity problems and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

28/100

“I didn't learn anything in this class at all”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ . Doesn't know what she's doing. Has no clarity in anything.”

💬 Discussion Upside

55/100

“classes consist of intriguing debates and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't teach so much as try to get you to think and discuss
  • Has no clarity in anything
  • talks about her personal life more then she actually teaches

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expected use of arg. techniques etc, but didn't teach them
  • , but only if you're strong in Eng/Phil.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • terrible teacher
  • .
  • she wants you to do well! !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only six short, mostly negative reviews from a narrow time window give low confidence despite a .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG53 reviews
ENGL52 reviews
ENGLISH51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1