AI Rate Professor

English

Carol Ciavonne

ENG10 · ENGL1B · ENGL1A · ENGL4A · ENG1A · ENG4A · ENGL312 · ENGL5 · ENG5 · ENGLISH1A · ENG4 · ENGL71 · ENGL0756 · ENG1B · ENGLISH · ENGLI302 · ENG100 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a demanding English class and and structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing PresenceDemanding Writing LoadClassroom IntimidatorCreative When AlignedMixed Clarity
  • Reviews split hard between warm creative mentor and rude intimidating classroom presence.
  • Students who prepare, read, and submit on time often succeed; others report unclear requirements.
  • Workload and tone feel heavier when she cold-calls or holds late classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some call classes easy with attention, but others say rewrites, heavy writing, and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty sits mid-range, with poetry and writing courses feeling freer and composition feeling tougher.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Students are expected to show up prepared; missing work or lateness is poorly received.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half rave about growth and help, while many others urge avoidance over rudeness and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and rewrites, but several students call her nitpicky and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Reading and papers are steady; creative writing can demand dozens of pages plus critiques.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Strong when interactive and supportive, weak when students feel degraded, cold-called, or .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person experience ranges from wonderful structured creativity to miserable cold-calling and .

Main concern

, and uneven favoritism.

What students said

“She's a wonderful teacher. She provided a learning environment that was both structured and conducive to creativity.”
ENGL4A
“ ! ”
ENG100
“she would ALWAYS randomly call on people and single out those who dont know the right answer.”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers, critiques, and .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is mostly writing-heavy with papers, critiques, and projects; .

Heavy writing loadPaper rewritesPeer critiquePoem memorization
“Expects 60 pages writing to be done by the end of the semester”
ENG4A
“if she gives you the chance of a !”
ENG1B
“The and the final conflict resolution project were up to each individual.”
ENGL5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I came to class everyday intimidated because she would ALWAYS randomly call on people and single out those who dont know the right answer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 in-person reviews, highlighting the split between demanding support and intimidating clarity issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Polarized Teaching

54/100

“She was disrespectful and degraded the students.”

📝 Demanding But Helpful

60/100

“She is very demanding and nit picky but as long as you do the reading and pay attention, you can learn a lot.”

❤️ Supportive Side

70/100

“Super sweet teacher... very interactive and available to her students.”

🚫

25/100

“AVOID! Probably the and not say the full requirements.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • structured and conducive to creativity
  • keeps discussion/class time flowing
  • every class is structured identically

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy if u pay attention
  • Expects 60 pages writing
  • there is a lot of work but

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • so very RUDE. NOT patient
  • treated all of us like children
  • she is a little judgmental

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three reviews give useful detail but opinions are highly polarized and somewhat dated.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1006 reviews
ENG54 reviews
ENGL54 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENG4A2 reviews
ENGL1B2 reviews
ENG101 review
ENG41 review
ENGL07561 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL3121 review
ENGL4A1 review
ENGL711 review
ENGLI3021 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values