Rene Peron

ANTHR21 · ANTHRO1ANTHR · ANTHRO · ANTHRO1AND2 · CULTUREANTHRO · ANTHROPOLOGY1 · ANTHRO2 · ANTHROPOLOGY · FIELDANTH · ANTHR2 · ANTRO1 · ANTHRO1 · ANTHRO3 · ANTHRO31 · CULTURALANTHRO · ANTHRO12331 · CULTANTH · ANTH666 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 52/100
RMP rating: 3.4/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.1

The decision

if you like quirky lecturers and will read the book; skip if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing humorExam-heavyTextbook-based testsSarcastic quirksPassionate storyteller

Many love his intelligence, stories, and humor; others call him fake, biased, or boring.
Grades often hinge on a .
Do the reading, show up, and expect sarcasm and digressions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some say read and show up for an A; , so effort is required and results vary.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges from easy for and textbook-heavy testing.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Depends

48/100

Recommendations split hard between fans of his humor and knowledge and critics who call him fake or biased.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Gives the grade earned; some find tests tough or .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

68/100

Often few or no papers and ; load is mostly reading plus a small number of exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong praise for intelligence and humor balanced by frequent claims of fakery, bias, boredom, and off-topic lectures.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple comments stress few exams, study guides, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

entertaining and knowledgeable for some, fake and off-topic for others, with .

Main concern

said in lecture.

What students said

“To get an A, read the text, do the .”
ANTHR2

“worst and most bias treacher i have ever had!”
ANTHR21

“ .”
ANTHRO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and textbook alignment varying widely by student.

Textbook-based examsFew examsStudy guidesHard midterms

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

on reading; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring tools.

Textbook-based examsFew examsStudy guides

“nevers opens a textbook in .”
ANTHR21

“ . He is a really cool guy, and he knows his stuff.”
ANTHRO1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“To get an A, read the text, do the ; in short take the time do your job as a student.”
Voice snapshots generated from 37 in-person , and textbook testing. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“This teacher is extremely intelligent, interesting and has a great sense of humor.”

👎 Polarization

40/100

“worst and most bias treacher i have ever had! couldnt careless about anyones beliefs but his own!”

📝

78/100

“only . if you do not do well on tests, then be careful with this one.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Entertaining and amusing
lectures always went off on tangents
tells the same tired stories every year

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

The class is easy as hell though
Read and show up to class for an A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Personality

A total phony
He's really full of himself
don't yawn

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

37 in-person reviews from 2003-2007 with rich, polarized detail; opinion consistency is low but volume and specificity are high.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515

4 out of 55

3 out of 58

2 out of 54

1 out of 55

Course coverage

ANTHRO18 reviews

ANTHRO28 reviews

ANTHRO4 reviews

ANTHR22 reviews

ANTHROPOLOGY2 reviews

Show 13 more courses

ANTH6661 review

ANTHR211 review

ANTHRO123311 review

ANTHRO1AND21 review

ANTHRO1ANTHR1 review

ANTHRO31 review

ANTHRO311 review

ANTHROPOLOGY11 review

ANTRO11 review

CULTANTH1 review

CULTURALANTHRO1 review

CULTUREANTHRO1 review

FIELDANTH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Rene Peron

x x x if you like quirky lecturers and will read the book; skip if x x x x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Recommended

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

👎 Polarization

📝 x x

👍 Recommendation Split

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

⚠️ About Personality

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you like quirky lecturers and will read the book; skip if .

📝