AI Rate Professor

Business

Howard Bryan

BOOKKEEPING · BGN81 · BBK50 · BBK51 · BBK50AMP51 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if possible; only consider with extreme patience for slow, repetitive bookkeeping lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardShould retireTedious lecturesUnprofessionalStickler on formattingWorst professor
  • Nearly all reviews rate him very poorly for teaching quality.
  • Lectures are described as tedious, repetitive, and unfocused.
  • Students call him rude or unprofessional and urge waiting until he retires.
  • keyPoints

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One reported A exists, but stickler formatting rules and high difficulty ratings mean an A still takes careful, tedious effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Bookkeeping content is not praised as easy; several rate difficulty high and stress pedantic technical details.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students repeatedly call him the and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Described as a stickler on indentations and spacing in journal entries.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload details are thin, but lectures and formatting precision make the class feel draining.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Consistently rated poorly for tedious, repetitive lectures and unprofessional student interactions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus on lectures and journal-entry precision without clear exam-versus-homework weights.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person bookkeeping classes widely rated as the stickler grading, and unprofessional interactions; a minority note he is pleasant if students redirect him.

Main concern

Extremely low teaching quality, rude interactions, and .

What students said

“ ”
BBK50
“His lectures are extremely tedious--he ambles on and often repeats himself.”
BBK51
“wait til he ”
BBK50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

“He is a stickler on measuring indentations on journal entries and measuring space between double underscore lines”
BBK51

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews (2004-2005), highlighting consistently poor teaching and tedious lectures. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ ”

🗣️ Lecture Style

20/100

“His lectures are extremely tedious--he ambles on and often repeats himself.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“wait til he ”

📏

28/100

“He is a stickler on measuring indentations on journal entries and measuring space between double underscore lines”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very tedious in his ramblings of teaching
  • His lectures are extremely tedious--he ambles on and often repeats himself
  • With patience he is a wonderful teacher

Theme 2

😠 About Professionalism

  • Very unprofessional in the way he speaks to students outside of his lectures. Rude!
  • wait til he

Theme 3

📒 About Bookkeeping Focus

  • stickler on measuring indentations on journal entries
  • tends to forget what we are covering and will repeat himself

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Seven old (2004-2005) mostly low-quality ratings with consistent negative tone but .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BBK503 reviews
BBK50AMP511 review
BBK511 review
BGN811 review
BOOKKEEPING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values