AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bill Ruehmann

MATH2500 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; the only review describes him as a terrible teacher with no clarity.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesNo board workRamblesOld-school styleDo not take
  • Single scathing review calls him unfocused and unclear
  • Never stands to work problems on the board
  • Student

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

No grade data and a high difficulty rating with no mention of As.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty rated 4/5 and the and incomplete.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only review ends with a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

No positive grading comments; difficulty is high and quality is rock-bottom.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described; only teaching quality and clarity are attacked.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Student says he rambles, never works problems on the board, and is a terrible teacher.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as unfocused, rambling, and unwilling to work problems on the board.

Main concern

No clarity or structure in explanations; student strongly warns others away.

What students said

“Bill Ruehmann is and old school teacher with no focus or clarity. Not once will he STAND UP to write a problem on the board.”
MATH2500

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“This, along with rambling on about nothing, makes him a terrible teacher.”

🚫 Recommendation

10/100

“ !!!!!”

🧩 Clarity

15/100

“Not once will he STAND UP to write a problem on the board.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • old school teacher with no focus or clarity
  • sits and
  • rambling on about nothing

Theme 2

⚠️ About Taking the Class

  • makes him a terrible teacher
  • !!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old review from 2012 with no grade data or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH25001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values