AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Rebeca Ramirez

ENG10 · ENGR10 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a warm, inspiring intro to engineering and and project workload.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspiring Intro MentorProject-DrivenHelpful and NiceAttendance-SensitiveCredit-for-Effort
  • Perfect 5.0 quality ratings across intro engineering courses
  • Projects and support push students toward an engineering path
  • Work is heavy for 1.5 credits but if you attend

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

and difficulty scores are low, so an A is realistic if you complete work and show up.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Intro engineering content needs no prior math or science and students rate difficulty around 1-2.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

though the rest of .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Every review is glowing and students say she solidified their choice to stay in engineering.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Full credit for .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students note a lot of work for a 1.5-credit class plus field trips and projects.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students call her great, helpful, and inspiring enough to pursue engineering.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and turn-ins rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Students praise her passion, helpfulness, and exciting projects that .

Main concern

Heavy work for a short-credit course and .

What students said

“she is great! made me want to pursue a degree in engineering...”
ENG10
“ . The projects were super interesting and exciting.”
ENG10
“There was a lot of work for a 1.5 credit class but you get full credit for just for turning it in.”
ENGR10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and completion credit more than formal exams.

Project-BasedCompletion Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment focuses on interesting projects with full credit for .

Project-BasedCompletion Credit
“There was a lot of work for a 1.5 credit class but you get full credit for just for turning it in.”
ENGR10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“With Rebeca's help, I've decided to stick with it. The class was very interesting and I .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2012. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟 Teaching Quality

94/100

“she is great! made me want to pursue a degree in engineering...”

🚀 Career Inspiration

92/100

“With Rebeca's help, I've decided to stick with it.”

📋 Work vs Credit

32/100

“There was a lot of work for a 1.5 credit class but you get full credit for just for turning it in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She loves her job and her students.
  • and nice!
  • she is great! made me want to pursue a degree in engineering...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • you get full credit for just for turning it in.
  • miss though!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three very old in-person reviews with consistent praise but limited grade and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG102 reviews
ENGR101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values