AI Rate Professor

Library Science

Arlene Kallen

LIR7743 · LIR7744 · LIR5028 · LIR10 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Avoid if you have another LIR option; expect and dry pacing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHarsh GraderBoring LecturesTreats Students Like ChildrenScatterbrainedMandatory Punctuality
  • Most students call LIR classes boring, slow, and a waste of time.
  • and late penalties frustrate many.
  • A and gives chances to succeed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Content is basic but and late penalties make a clean A effortful.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is research basics many already know, but class time is slow and frustrating.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students must show up; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most and poorly taught.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Repeatedly called a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Assignments are basic but and strict scoring add friction.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common themes are boredom, poor interaction, scatterbrained pacing, and talking down to students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Homework and punctual submission .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mostly negative in-person library research classes described as dry, slow, and .

Main concern

, and treating adults like children.

What students said

“This class was a complete was of time! She did a poor job of interacting with the class which made the class painfully slower.”
LIR5028
“She is a .”
LIR10
“ but gives you every chance to succeed. !”
LIR10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; and attendance.

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting harsh grading and low engagement. Credibility rating: Medium.

😕 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She is an inarticulate, bumbling ninny. .”

⚖️

24/100

“She is a .”

🚪

18/100

“If you you're late to class your hw score is cut in half.”

👍 Minority Support

55/100

“ but gives you every chance to succeed. !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • painfully slower
  • boring, dull personality, and very monotonic
  • Treats everyone like children

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you you're late to class your hw score is cut in half
  • but gives you every chance to succeed

Theme 3

📚 About Course Value

  • complete was of time
  • material taught is pointless
  • teaches us things that will most likely be important to know later on

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2010-2012 are mostly consistent negatives with two positive outliers.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LIR104 reviews
LIR50281 review
LIR77431 review
LIR77441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values