AI Rate Professor

English

Chris Riebli

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGL100 · ENGL4806 · ENG100 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a low-intensity English class and can tolerate .

Best fit · Self Taught ProRambles A LotMood GradingBoring LecturesEasy HomeworkParticipation Favored
  • Content and , but lectures feel boring and repetitive
  • to decode
  • Speaking up and notebook work matter more than pure writing quality for some students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, but several students say grades depend on mood, participation, or a soft ceiling near C or B.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Many call the class easy if and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, though showing up and speaking up are repeatedly advised.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Some praise fairness and rewrites, while others call him boring, unhelpful, and the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Several students report mood-based or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Typical load is nightly reading summaries plus a modest set of essays across the term.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

some find him cool and fair, many find lectures boring, rambling, and unhelpful on essays.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades revolve around notebook work, essays, discussion, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

easy readings and , but frequent complaints about boredom and .

Main concern

Emotional or and heavy class talk can frustrate .

What students said

“He drones on the whole class about the . He is absolutely no help with essays; grades purely on emotion”
ENG1A
“his grading scale makes no sense. There is no math involved in really tell you why.”
ENG1A
“Very cool guy. Like any other English1A class you have a lot of but he .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard in-person English assessments such as an .

Essay FinalMidterm From Class FocusIn-Class Discussion Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention an if you pay attention and a detail.

Essay FinalMidterm From Class Focus
“Pay attention in class and mid-term is easy.”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guy was super easy in Eng 100, but when it comes to Eng 1A he's the worst. He drones on the whole class about the . He is absolutely no help with essays; grades purely on emotion, and no reasoning behind the grading.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews, highlighting mixed English teaching quality and . Credibility rating: High.

🥱 Lecture Style

48/100

“Extremely boring teacher. You could never know . BORING”

⚖️

42/100

“his grading scale makes no sense. There is no math involved in really tell you why.”

📝 Workload Ease

72/100

“The and 6 essays for the semester. I thought it was a pretty easy class to show up to.”

Theme 1

🗣️ About Teaching Style

  • Likes to hear himself talk.
  • He rambles A LOT.
  • Extremely boring teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades purely on emotion, and no reasoning behind the grading
  • he

Theme 3

📓 About Classwork

  • do the then summarize it in your notebook)
  • Read the stories, write in your notebook and speak up in class
  • He allows students to re-write essays if their not satisfied with their grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed in-person reviews from 2007-2012 show consistent themes on boredom, rambling, and .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENGL48061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values