AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Muiz Brinkerhoff

CIS58 · CS1324 · DW8 · HTML2 · HTML1379 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless and do not need instructor help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive to QuestionsHarsh or Petty GradingHeavy Self-Study LoadWebsite Validation IssuesAvoid for Support Needs
  • Students repeatedly say he refuses questions and tells them to just read.
  • , and uneven standards.
  • Several comments warn against taking him when support is needed, especially online-style formats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Comments , and little guidance rather than an easy A.

; no online reviews counted.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty and and terminology-heavy content.

; no online reviews counted.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews counted.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students warn others away because of ignored questions, hypocrisy, and weak support.

; no online reviews counted.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students report and color choices not clearly listed in the syllabus.

Format shift

; no online reviews counted.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple reviews describe a lot of work and .

Format shift

; no online reviews counted.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Common complaints are refusing questions, being unresponsive, and not teaching the material clearly.

Format shift

; no online reviews counted.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments focus on site work, reading, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews counted.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most reviews describe little teaching support, rude or dismissive responses, and heavy independent work despite some older praise.

Main concern

Students report ignored questions, unresponsive help, and strict or .

What students said

“Refuses to answer questions regarding the reading and either ignores or tell you to read the material (aka refuses to teach).”
HTML2
“This online professor is unresponsive to requests for help, doesn't provide video lectures”
CS1324
“Took online CSS website, was a LOT of work.”
CIS58

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring software, or open-book rules.

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; complaints center on unresponsive help and .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Refuses to answer questions regarding the reading and either ignores or tell you to read the material (aka refuses to teach).”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Support

32/100

“Refuses to answer questions regarding the reading and either ignores or tell you to read the material (aka refuses to teach).”

⚖️

28/100

“grades down for spelling and color choice is isn't fond of (even though those reasons aren't described in his syllabus)”

📚 Heavy Workload

24/100

“Took online CSS website, was a LOT of work.”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“ . You will get no support if you have questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • refuses to teach
  • doesn't provide video lectures
  • he does not answer questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • was a LOT of work
  • He has several validation errors on the class website
  • grades down for spelling and color choice

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Is exceptionally rude in personal comments
  • .
  • nice guy and a nice teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews from 2007-2011 mostly agree on weak support and , though the sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HTML22 reviews
CIS581 review
CS13241 review
DW81 review
HTML13791 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values