AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Oliver Deegan

AJ71 · AJ21 · AJ71AJ55 · AJ55 · AJAJ53 · AJ70 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a knowledgeable, supportive criminal justice instructor who helps you succeed.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and AccessibleCriminal Justice ExpertClear ExpectationsGrade-FriendlyWell Liked
  • Nearly all reviews rate him 5/5 and , and well liked.
  • Students say he answers quickly, helps raise grades, and keeps work reasonable.
  • Course content builds real criminal justice knowledge without crushing difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report achievable As with reasonable work and active help improving grades.

; one student mentioned an online class experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Work is not too hard and difficulty averages moderate, but students still learn substantial CJ content.

; one student mentioned an online class experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

All counted reviews are in-person with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Students repeatedly call him great, excellent, accessible, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

He actively helps students improve grades and keeps expectations realistic.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Students say work was not too hard and expectations were not too high.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Consistently described as , and well liked.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize learning and support more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person (and one self-described online) , and manageable.

Main concern

Attendance and reviews.

What students said

“If you ever had a question he would get back to you right away, and always did what he could to help people get a better grade”
AJ21
“ not too high”
AJ71AJ55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but students report strong support toward better grades.

Limited Exam DetailHelpful Retakes or Grade Support

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style; .

Limited Exam DetailHelpful Grade Support
“always did what he could to help people get a better grade. I got an A in this class.”
AJ21

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I had him for an on-line class but . If you ever had a question he would get back to you right away, and always did what he could to help people get a better grade. I got an A in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting helpfulness and manageable CJ coursework. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Excellent instructor, well .”

📚 Subject Mastery

90/100

“Awesome teacher who knows his stuff. and you will learn much about the criminal justice system.”

👍 Support for Grades

78/100

“always did what he could to help people get a better grade. I got an A in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !
  • .

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • he would get back to you right away
  • Great help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly positive older reviews (2003-2011) are consistent but many are brief and lack grade detail.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AJ213 reviews
AJ552 reviews
AJ701 review
AJ711 review
AJ71AJ551 review
Show 1 more courses
AJAJ531 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1