AI Rate Professor

Business

Claire Romero

BUS9042 · MSWORD · BOT73 · CS5137 · BOT162A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Skip her sections if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOften LateDisorganizedNice but Weak TeachingLost AssignmentsWaste of Time Risk
  • Repeated late arrivals and lost assignments
  • Nice personality but weak teaching and organization
  • Multiple students call classes a waste of time

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty ratings vary and ; issues are .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Some classes felt slow or simple; and complication.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

complaints.

In-person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Multiple students say and wasted time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; complaints focus on lost work and delivery.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

; another relied heavily on the book.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Often late, disorganized, simplistic delivery despite being described as nice.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Homework and .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Business-related instructor praised as but criticized for lateness, disorganization, lost work, and weak delivery.

Main concern

Chronic lateness, disorganization, and poor communication.

What students said

“Teacher was late for every class, lost assignments and .”
CS5137
“This class was a waste of time. Over 80% of the students were dissapointed in the class.”
BOT162A
“Ms. and interaction with students was simplistic”
BUS9042

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; and class delivery.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher was late for every class, lost assignments and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting lateness and weak organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“not great at teaching this subject”

⏰ Punctuality Issues

20/100

“Teacher was late for every class”

🚫 Recommendation

30/100

“ !”

❤️ Personality

70/100

“ , but not great at teaching this subject”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not great at teaching this subject
  • Ms.
  • horrible communication skills

Theme 2

⏰ About Organization

  • late for every class, lost assignments
  • The teacher arrived late for both classes
  • This class was a waste of time

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Still, she is an awesome lady

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five in-person reviews from 2006-2011 with consistent organization and lateness complaints but one empty comment.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BOT162A1 review
BOT731 review
BUS90421 review
CS51371 review
MSWORD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values