AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susan Amalia

CSKL371 · MATH · CSKLS268 · COUN371 · MATH370 · HORRIBLE · CSKL370 · CSKLS368A · MATH371 · CSKLS368B · CSK371 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will treat class seriously and ask for help; if you need a chill, low-friction math ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardNo BS expectedBuilds math confidenceHelpful if you askPolarizing temperSecond chances
  • and real skill gains when you stay responsible and ask for help.
  • A meaningful minority report bad temper, fast pace, and unwillingness to help.
  • An A is reachable if you keep up with homework and use the material she provides.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students say an A is realistic if you keep up with homework and use her materials, but and lazy work is not rewarded.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard developmental math difficulty; some find it easy with her methods while others call the pace too fast.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews rarely spell out a formal attendance rule, so .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and confidence gains, but a vocal group urges others to stay away.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Second chances and easy A with effort appear, but and she does not tolerate low effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and some report rushing through material, but workload is not described as crushing.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Strong praise for clarity, organization, and student support is offset by reports of , and rushed lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, with limited detail on pure exam weight.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math skills classes feel supportive and skill-building for engaged students, but some find her rushed, intimidating, or harsh.

Main concern

Temper and pace can shut down students who need more patience or slower lecture speed.

What students said

“An excellent mathematics teacher! I came away from this class with solid skills in math as well as confidence in problem solving.”
CSKLS268
“Wonderful instructor. If you put in the effort, you will have no problem, easy A.”
MATH
“Horrible teacher, can't ask questions, bad temper, will kick you out for no reason. STAY AWAY!”
MATH371

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard but fair if you use the lecture material; proctoring and .

Hard testsMaterial provided to passUnclear quiz timing

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but students say she gives the material needed to pass with an A; timing of .

Hard testsMaterial provided to passUnclear quiz timing
“ , but gives you all the material you need to pass with an A.”
CSK371
“ and tests times.”
MATH370

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“An excellent mathematics teacher! I came away from this class with solid skills in math as well as confidence in problem solving. and very helpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010, , and polarizing temperament. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“ ! She is the only instructor who has been able to get me to understand and even enjoy math.”

👍 Recommendation Split

64/100

“ if math is /was intimidating to you, you will be in the right place.”

⚠️ Temper Risk

35/100

“Horrible teacher, can't ask questions, bad temper, will kick you out for no reason. STAY AWAY!”

📈 Effort For Grades

62/100

“Wonderful instructor. If you put in the effort, you will have no problem, easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and very helpful
  • . Has a great passion for her students
  • too fast paced for me personally

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but gives you all the material you need to pass with an A
  • keep up with the if you do you will be very successful
  • she always gives second chances

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she does not put up with any BS and expects you to be responsible
  • she is a sweet and funny lady in her weird ways
  • Please don't be affraid of her bad attitude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen detailed but older in-person reviews (mostly 2005-2010) show a consistent polarized pattern, which supports medium confidence.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

3713 reviews
MATH3713 reviews
CSK3712 reviews
CSKL3712 reviews
MATH2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
COUN3711 review
CSKL3701 review
CSKLS2681 review
CSKLS368A1 review
CSKLS368B1 review
HORRIBLE1 review
MATH3701 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values