AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Carol Alen

POLS6535 · POLS2499 · POLS2496 · POLS7769 · POLS1A · POLISCI1 · POLSCI · POLY1 · POLYSCI1 · POLISCI · POLS1 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will do the reading and want a real political science course; skip if you want an easy A with little work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate about politicsReading is mandatoryFair but hard testsBalanced debatesNo hand-holding
  • Students must do the reading and participate; success is effort-driven not automatic.
  • Most praise her passion, balance, and willingness to help when students seek her out.
  • A , and tone too opinionated.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A requires consistent reading and solid test performance; few graded items make recovery hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard intro poli sci made livelier by discussion, but concepts and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance is not clearly formal policy, but and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most students recommend her for passion and learning, with a .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Many call her fair, but and few graded items leave little cushion.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reading is required and central; as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Strong majority praise passion, balance, and clarity; a few report off-topic stories and disorganization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades hinge on a few tests plus presentations or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and self-advocacy; lectures can wander but many leave more interested in government.

Main concern

Hard or if you do not keep up with the book.

What students said

“You MUST do the reading, and put in effort to do well.”
POLS1
“ . I found that she is a very fair teacher.”
POLS1
“The key to success in this class is to DO THE .”
POLISCI

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Typically a small number of closed-note tests drawn from readings, with mixed reports on difficulty.

Few testsBook-based questionsNo notesHard for some

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes closed-note; some call them easy and others hard.

No notesBook-based testsFew exams
“ .”
POLS1
“ . Very interesting lectures and projects. But I got screwed with the tests.”
POLS1A
“3 Tests are direct from book little tough, debate thing is easy.”
POLS1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . If you apply yourself and don't expect to be babysat, you'll be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010, weighing praise for and organization complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Carol is a wonderful teacher She extremely passionate and is here for the students”

📖 Reading Requirement

40/100

“You MUST do the reading, and put in effort to do well.”

👍 Overall Recommendation

68/100

“ . She's great.”

📝 Test Pressure

42/100

“ . Very interesting lectures and projects. But I got screwed with the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She openly discussed both sides of every issue
  • She really wants you to be interested
  • She is a very helpful and caring person

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You MUST do the reading
  • and a debate

Theme 3

⚠️ About Criticisms

  • She vears off onto her own stories
  • Very opinionated
  • Class is boring and not completely factual

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but detailed comments; ages and missing grades lower confidence.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLS14 reviews
POLISCI1 review
POLISCI11 review
POLS1A1 review
POLS24961 review
Show 6 more courses
POLS24991 review
POLS65351 review
POLS77691 review
POLSCI1 review
POLY11 review
POLYSCI11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values