AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Donna Emerson

COUN93 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if and will use redo opportunities to improve.

Best fit · Effort For RewardProfessionalWriting FocusedRedo FriendlyHard but FairSubject Expert
  • Professional instructor who prioritizes strong writing
  • Difficulty is high but
  • Students leave knowing the subject better

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Difficulty is rated very high though redo opportunities after .

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Student rated difficulty at the top and stressed demanding writing standards.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

The lone review is respectful and positive on .

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

High standards but so effort can recover the grade.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Writing quality is central so expect careful revision work though volume is not quantified.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Described as professional interesting and effective at making students learn the subject.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on written work with .

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single in-person review describes a professional writing-focused class with redo chances.

Main concern

High difficulty and heavy emphasis on polished writing.

What students said

“VERY professional. I knew my subject when I was done. She is an interesting person and good writing is very important to her and to her subject.”
COUN93

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not describe exams and instead highlight writing quality with redo opportunities.

Writing HeavyRedo After Feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; grading focuses on writing with .

Writing HeavyRedo After Feedback
“She gives every opportunity to redo work to get the best grade you are capable of .”
COUN93

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“VERY professional. I knew my subject when I was done. She is an interesting person and good writing is very important to her and to her subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with limited breadth. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“VERY professional. I knew my subject when I was done.”

📝 Writing Standards

75/100

“good writing is very important to her and to her subject.”

♻️ Redo Opportunities

70/100

“She gives every opportunity to redo work to get the best grade you are capable of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • VERY professional.
  • She is an interesting person
  • I knew my subject when I was done.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • good writing is very important to her and to her subject.
  • She gives every opportunity to redo work to get the best grade you are capable of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one in-person review from 2010 so confidence is low despite decent detail in that comment.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUN931 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values