AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

G Stan

MATH3241 · MATH150A · MATH150 · MATH151 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid G Stan if ; only self-taught students should risk it.

Best fit · Self Taught ProShould retireBoard errorsHard to hearSelf-teach requiredExams harder than homework
  • Students repeatedly say he should retire and cannot teach math clearly.
  • Board work and , and speech is hard to hear.
  • Success depends on self-teaching from the book; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Students report withdrawals, self-teaching, and , so an A is not easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and it should be.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but class time is often treated as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly all reviews and say he should not be teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report grading mistakes and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and is manageable, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews describe wrong board work, muttering, low patience, and essentially no effective teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams drive outcomes and are described as .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as poorly taught, hard to hear, error-prone, and self-study heavy.

Main concern

You may learn almost nothing in lecture and .

What students said

“he is the ! i feel bad for him but he is too old and needs to retire! !”
MATH150A
“He get's his own equations wrong, mutters into the blackboard”
MATH3241
“ .”
MATH151

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and poorly supported by unclear lectures, so risk is high.

Exams harder than homeworkSelf-study dependentBoard and grading errors

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and require self-teaching from the book.

Exams harder than homeworkSelf-teach from textbookFrequent simple errors
“ .”
MATH151
“I ended up teaching myself everything out of the book and .”
MATH151
“He wouldn't show the work, and would put the wrong answers on the board until the students pointed it out.”
MATH150A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This man should not be teaching. He has very little patience in helping students and is .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person , and self-study burden. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“he is the ! i feel bad for him but he is too old and needs to retire! !”

🧮 Board Errors

15/100

“He get's his own equations wrong, mutters into the blackboard”

📚

20/100

“I ended up teaching myself everything out of the book and .”

📝

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Ability

  • This man should not be teaching
  • has no teaching abilities whatsoever
  • He should really retire

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this is the first class I?ve had to withdraw from
  • He makes a LOT of simple errors, like dropping negative signs!

Theme 3

🧓 About Classroom Presence

  • mutters into the blackboard
  • He shakes and you can't hear him because he can't really speak up
  • running out of patience - not good in a teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews from 2005-2010 are highly consistent about poor teaching, errors, and retirement concerns despite age of data.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH150A7 reviews
MATH1501 review
MATH1511 review
MATH32411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values