AI Rate Professor

Agriculture & Natl Resources

D Crump

NRM85 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

; treat as unknown until more reviews appear.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMinimal FeedbackSingle ReviewUnclear Style
  • Only one review exists and it contains almost no usable detail.
  • Quality was rated 4 but difficulty was rated 5 in that review.
  • There is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The sole review rates difficulty at 5 with no grade or effort details, so an easy A is not supported.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

That review marks course difficulty as 5, implying challenging content.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Quality score of 4 is decent but the comment is nonsense and gives no recommendation signal.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

judge leniency.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in the only review.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Quality rated 4, but the comment provides no teaching detail to raise or lower confidence.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single cryptic in-person comment offers almost no actionable insight beyond a mid-high quality score.

Main concern

Nearly .

What students said

“She's Crump, she's Crump, She's Crump...”
NRM85

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's Crump, she's Crump, She's Crump...”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 sparse review with almost no detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She's Crump, she's Crump, She's Crump...”

⚠️ Limited Evidence

18/100

“She's Crump, she's Crump, She's Crump...”

Theme 1

📝

  • She's Crump, she's Crump, She's Crump...

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

One vague 2009 review with no grades, tags, or substance makes credibility very low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NRM851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values