AI Rate Professor

English

Matthew Sieggel

ENG1A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you want a tough, book-heavy English course with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFoggy assignmentsHeavy readingWork your butt offMany booksHard course
  • and foggy to students.
  • , and many books create high workload.
  • if you show strong effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Student says prepare to work your butt off with lots of reading and books for little gains.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty 4 plus heavy annotating and multi-book workload make content hard.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Quality rated 1 with foggy assignments and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

No grade reported and hard .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of reading, annotating, and many books for small tasks.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

18/100

Assignments feel foggy and quality is rated 1 of 5.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments center on reading, annotating, and book-based tasks rather than exams.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One negative , and high effort.

Main concern

and heavy book load.

What students said

“ and annotating.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and annotating.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting clarity and workload pain. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

18/100

“ and annotating.”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“Be prepared to work your butt off and use a bunch of books for little things here and there.”

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“Professor QUALITY rating: 1”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • as long as he sees you're really wanting to be successful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be prepared to work your butt off
  • use a bunch of books for little things here and there

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2015 review with no grade or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values