AI Rate Professor

Business

Eric Barajas

BUS21 · BUS22 · BUS20 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
23.33%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if possible; students repeatedly say you will teach yourself with little support and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive emailsLate or missing gradesUnclear instructionsDisorganized course setupLecture-heavy slides
  • Most recent reviews slam unresponsiveness, multi-week grading delays, and .
  • Online sections especially feel abandoned, with locked modules, missing syllabi, and .
  • A smaller set of , but they are outnumbered by Avoid-level reports.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Content is not always advanced, but late grading, strict scoring, and .

Online students more often report grade shocks and zeros from communication failures; in person is more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Business topics are often basic, but and poor organization raise the effective difficulty.

In-person students more often call content easy or chill; online students experience higher friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Many in-person and as mandatory, while several online reviews say it is not required.

In-person leans mandatory; online is inconsistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Take-again is about 23 percent, and the dominant .

Online recommendation is near floor level; a signal.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly report tough scoring, no late work, and long periods with missing or unexplained grades.

Format shift

Harshness appears in both formats, with online adding nonresponse around grade disputes.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Assignment volume is mixed, but unclear deadlines and it looks.

Format shift

Online students stress unpredictable assignment drops more than pure volume.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

The prevailing picture is disorganization, weak communication, and lectures that do not clearly prepare students.

Format shift

In person has some caring outliers; online is almost uniformly poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and occasional projects, with several comments that few graded items control the grade.

Format shift

In person mentions quizzes and notes more; online emphasizes scattered assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call him caring and note-friendly, .

Main concern

Even with higher marks, students and does not teach the tested material clearly.

What students said

“Most of his lectures are just rants. He assigns barely anything but grades super strict.”
Bus-21
“Mr. Barajas is an amazing professor. He teaches the criteria clearly and let you use your notes for tests and quizzes.”
BUS-22
“This guy dosent even grade any of the work till the very end the last week of the semester.”
BUS-22

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative , and disorganized Canvas setup.

Main concern

Students report failed communication, random due dates, and grades that stay unknown for weeks.

What students said

“By far the .”
BUS-20
“Unresponsive to emails, doesnt grade work on time, and shows no support towards students.”
BUS-22
“As of Dec. 3rd, there's a 100 point assignment due Monday Dec. 9. It is locked and "part of an unpublished module".”
BUS-22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some students can use notes on quizzes, but unclear setup and .

Quizzes and testsNotes allowed in some sectionsUnclear quiz setupLate grade release

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and occasional open-note quizzes without strong proctoring details.

In-class quizzesNotes allowed on some testsTest heavy
“He teaches the criteria clearly and let you use your notes for tests and quizzes.”
BUS-22
“ and then give us a .”
31156

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring tools; and .

Late gradingUnclear quiz instructions
“ . It would be multiple weeks or even a little over a month for .”
BUS-22
“The only thing that I was able to get done with no problem were the quizzes.”
31156

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Unresponsive to emails, doesnt grade work on time, and shows no support towards students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 , and organization failures. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Communication Failure

18/100

“I had to email multiple times just to get a one sentence response, if I even got one.”

⏳

20/100

“ . It would be multiple weeks or even a little over a month.”

🧩 Course Organization

22/100

“No schedule for the class so .”

👎 Recommendation Level

22/100

“Overall a horrible professor and .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • because it's all completely different things.
  • Most of his lectures are just rants.
  • he only reads from the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Get ready to have a -33% for a while.
  • Accepts 0 late work and little to no .
  • .

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • Oh I .
  • told to find a counselor, even though I'm a dually enrolled high school student.
  • He even helped me with questions about my business career.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty recent, highly consistent negative reviews plus a smaller positive cluster give medium-high confidence in the .

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 520

Course coverage

BUS-2217 reviews
311568 reviews
Bus-214 reviews
BUS-201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4