AI Rate Professor

History

Kaliopi Pappas

CIV03 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
12.12%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you have no alternative and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingSo many papersSlow gradingConfusing criteria
  • Most and civilization courses
  • Heavy reading, papers, and
  • A small minority found the class passable or easy, but tone is overwhelmingly negative

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even passable grades often require heavy papers and ; Fs and incomplete grades appear often.

Online has more easy-A outliers; in-person and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and dense reading make the content workload-heavy and hard to manage.

; online adds movie papers on short deadlines.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

Many online and some in-person reviews say attendance was not mandatory, though a .

Online is mostly optional; and no-late enforcement.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

About 12% would take again and the dominant message is save yourself and pick another history professor.

A few online positives exist, but both .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report nitpicking, points off for length or AI flags, inconsistent late policy, and .

Format shift

Online and delayed scores; in-person on strictness and .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Lots of reading, discussion , and test-heavy weeks.

Format shift

Online movie-and-paper weeks are especially heavy; .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Common themes are disorganized instructions, slow responses, off-topic lectures, and feeling unsupported.

Format shift

Both formats negative; rare warm-up-later positives online do not reverse the pattern.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of discussions, papers, midterm/final papers or tests, and .

Format shift

Online often paper- and discussion-heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students report long off-topic , and strict no-late policies.

Main concern

Hostile classroom tone and .

What students said

“It was like she was always in a bad mood and very unapproachable.”
70309
“This is one of the whole class and doesn't let students participate or even ask questions”
CIV03
“ .”
70309

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe heavy reading, , and sudden tough grading.

Main concern

Unclear or late-revealed criteria and are doing.

What students said

“She does not grade herself, she uses AI to grade. She will tell you work that is not grammatically incorrect is "89% ai" Save your sanity. .”
70309
“Took so long to grade every single assignment, , and would ignore emails.”
70309
“ if u wanna pass, avoid her at all costs, get someone better.”
CIV03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are demanding papers and and limited flexibility on late work.

Test heavySo many papersPrimary sourcesNo late work oftenLengthy discussion answers

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and paper instructions, long papers, and test-heavy load without student-friendly open formats.

Long papersTest heavyUnclear instructions
“ and often contradict past assignments. The papers for this class were horrible and long.”
70309
“she will give you a lot of .”
CIV03

Online

Online work includes chapter discussions, papers, midterm and and slow turnaround.

Discussion postsPapersMidterm paperFinal exam paperPrimary source heavy
“3 papers, the , and as well. It was too much”
CIV03
“ . She expects me to go more in depth with my answers on the test despite the little time she offers.”
CIV03

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“BEWARE. and taking another class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

15/100

“ .”

📚 Heavy Workload

18/100

“ if you have any other classes or a full-time job.”

⚖️

18/100

“ , and would ignore emails.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All she did was talk and barely allow us to contribute.
  • Her lectures were very long and she often went off-topic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She does not grade herself, she uses AI to grade.
  • at first she graded easy then suddenly decided to be a

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She started sending leaks and it traumatized the whole class
  • always in a bad mood and very unapproachable
  • I wanna cry

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

33 reviews with strong consistency on tough grading, heavy work, and and .

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 525

Course coverage

7030920 reviews
CIV0313 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 6 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

1

D+ 1

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

5

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2