AI Rate Professor

History

Evan Wade

HIST017A · HIST30B · HIST030A · HIST17A · HIST030B · HIST30A · LAW16 · 147 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
38.64%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you truly want a heavy history or law workload and can handle strict AI scrutiny and delayed grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderAI accusationsLots of homeworkLate gradingPassionate lectures
  • and weekly work with and frequent AI flags
  • Many students report and
  • A minority who put in major effort praise passionate teaching especially in LAW16

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A requires sustained and dense weekly assignments.

Both formats reject easy A expectations; LAW16 positives still require real work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Content is reading and writing intensive with AP-like rigor for a lower-division load.

Online and ; LAW16 is demanding but more rewarding for some.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Many sections require Zoom or and participation is heavily weighted.

and several history sections; some online history is less strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and dominant warnings about stress harsh zeros and communication outweigh minority raves.

In-person LAW16 has more MustTake style praise while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and final papers scored very low dominate student reports.

Format shift

and in history; some LAW16 students call him fair if effort is high.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

and internship style work overload students with other classes.

Format shift

Both formats report excessive work; .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Passion and knowledge are real for some but unprepared lectures poor communication and unfair AI enforcement tank the experience for many.

Format shift

LAW16 in-person teaching praise is high; online history teaching ratings are often very low.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of and final exams.

Format shift

Online leans papers and finals; in-person LAW16 adds internship and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews split between LAW16 fans who love passion and mandatory-effort success and history students who report overload harsh zeros and bias claims.

Main concern

and little flexibility if you fall behind.

What students said

“Difficult but doable! My fav class and Professor :)... ever!”
Law16
“ unless you approach him... assigns so much work and never grades on time”
HIST30B
“If you signed up for the .”
HIST017A

Remote format

Online

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online history sections are workload-heavy with and repeated AI zero complaints plus weak email response.

Main concern

False AI flags zeros and grades that arrive too late to improve.

What students said

“Will accuse you of using AI. Graded everything extremely late until the last day of break.”
HIST017A
“Literally the worse teacher I've had and the most stressful course.”
HIST17A
“Accuses you of ... Overall, I would not recommend this class or professor to anyone.”
Law16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Major assessments are high-stakes writing and finals with strict AI policing and little student-friendly leeway.

Tough final essaysAI detector zerosStudy guide finals reportedLate grading on major papersRubric-strict writing

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and research essays are also described as harsh with zeros and little flexibility; LAW16 fans say success tracks effort.

Harsh final research essayMandatory lecturesPortfolio and presentation work
“I gave it all in and gave me a zero out of 100!”
HIST17A
“What you put in to the course is what you get out of it.”
Law16

Online

Online students report hard finals segmented papers and AI flags that can zero major work.

AI detector flagsHard finalSegmented paper assignmentsLate grade release
“he uses an outdated ai detector and if even gives you 1% match to ai he will give you a 0.”
HIST017A
“When I tell you I got flagged for ? And he graded it the 4 days before semester ended”
HIST017A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews capturing harsh grading AI flags workload and minority passion praise. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️

18/100

“He is a . I've worked really hard at this class and don't feel like my grades reflect the effort.”

🤖 AI Flag Risk

20/100

“Even if you write your own he flags you for ai.”

📚 Workload Intensity

16/100

“The amount of work for this class alone equates to a full schedule.”

🔥 Passion Minority View

75/100

“Do not expect an easy A, and if he go into the class knowing you will have to put in effort, you will learn so much!”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Accuses you of
  • uses a unreliable ai detector
  • gave me a 32/100

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Plenty of work assignments
  • .
  • It is like an AP class, but without getting credit for it.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • .
  • grades papers like a 6-year-old
  • never grades on time so you won't even know what your grade is until the end of the semester

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

147

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent detailed polarized reviews with recurring AI workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 538
4 out of 526
3 out of 515
2 out of 514
1 out of 555

Course coverage

HIST017A15 reviews
HIST17A13 reviews
Law168 reviews
HIST030A5 reviews
HIST30A4 reviews
Show 2 more courses
HIST030B3 reviews
HIST30B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 1 · A 10 · A- 5

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

7

C 6 · C- 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

17

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 6