AI Rate Professor

English

Julie Jose

ENG1A · ENG1D · ENGLISH1A · ENGL62B · ENG1B · ENG55B · ENG30 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
21.05%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if you can; organization issues and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedAI AccusationsTough GraderEssay OverloadSlow Feedback
  • Most recent , and contradictory feedback.
  • Heavy essay and .
  • A minority of and workable, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and AI flags mean an A usually requires constant stress and perfect compliance.

Online reviews emphasize AI zeros; and volume.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The intellectual content is standard composition, but , and moving deadlines make the course hard to manage.

and many essays; online adds more confusion about modules.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Some while and online listings say attendance is required.

and format.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Take-again rate is about 21% and recent comments repeatedly beg students to pick anyone else.

and in person, with only older positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader tags dominate, AI detector penalties are severe, and .

Format shift

Harsh AI-related grading is mainly online; .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students describe stacks of essays, journals, readings, and .

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both online and in-person English courses.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Many call her kind but , and inconsistent in what she wants.

Format shift

Poor organization is the shared theme; and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grade , and reading responses rather than classic exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students report heavy papers, public critique of writing, disorganization, and .

Main concern

Embarrassment in class and term.

What students said

“She will read your writing out loud and if she doesn't like it she almost likes embarrases you.”
ENG1B
“This professor assigned 12 assignments back to back within the first month of the semester Theres so .”
ENG30
“Has great passion for her subject and and leniant with late work. However, she is EXTREMELY UNORGINIZED.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw the strongest complaints , and heavy paper load.

Main concern

AI detectors and proof.

What students said

“She relies on AI for and . If your writing even comes up as 5% AI, she would flag it and give you barely any credit.”
ENG30
“She accused me of AI use and gave me a 0/100 with no proof.”
ENG30
“Extremely lazy. By the time you've finished an entire month of work, she'll have just barely made headway on grading just one of .”
ENG1D

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and writing tasks; and occasional tests.

Multiple EssaysDiscussion PostsLate GradingAI Detection

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and strict MLA; webcam or Lockdown Browser is not clearly mentioned.

Multiple EssaysJournalsStrict MLA
“She gives out more than 5 double entry journals and 4 essays.”
ENG1A
“she takes away many points. If at its highest level.”
ENG1B

Online

Online evidence focuses on essays, discussion posts, and .

Essay HeavyAI DetectionSlow Feedback
“She accused me of AI use and gave me a 0/100 with no proof.”
ENG30
“It's a ton of reading, and we're .”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save your GPA and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting disorganization, essay load, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ and her feedback.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ !!!!”

🤖

20/100

“She relies on AI for and .”

📚 Workload

18/100

“I cried this whole semester due to the stress of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She is completely contradictory with .
  • While Professor Jose is a good person, her teaching methods leave much to be desired.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a as well.
  • She accused me of AI use and gave me a 0/100 with no proof.
  • We're .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Jose may be kind, but .
  • very unorganized, changes deadlines, 4 essays, tough grader, but .
  • She is truly unique. She challenges us, so we can be GREAT.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews over several years strongly agree on disorganization and tough writing load, with .

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 522

Course coverage

ENG1B14 reviews
ENG3010 reviews
ENG1A6 reviews
ENG1D3 reviews
ENG55B3 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGL62B1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

10

B 6 · B- 4

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5