AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Sarah Astarte

PSYCH1 · PSYCH6 · PSYCH3 · PSYCH001 · PYSCH001 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a lighter intro psych path and and long free-response tests.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolarizingLong Free-Response TestsOff-Topic GossipUnclear InstructionsHilarious Lectures
  • Reviews split hard between funny engaging lectures and unprofessional or .
  • Coursework is often easy but and .
  • An A is available for students who do the work, yet many say they learned little psychology.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many report easy work and high grades if you complete modules, but .

; and get an A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Content is introductory and , though modules and .

Both formats describe accessible material with uneven teaching clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Most listed sections require attendance or participation even when lectures feel off-topic.

; online also often lists attendance as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

About 40% would retake; fans love humor while and .

volume.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and easy while others say criteria are ambiguous with and little explanation.

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and discussions are light to moderate, but .

Format shift

Online reviews highlight .

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Humor and energy win fans, yet vague lectures, gossip, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews are more polarized; online adds long-test and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Discussion boards and some papers exist, but and finals dominate student stress.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

supporters praise hilarious lectures while critics cite gossip, vague lessons, and .

Main concern

, and weak response to emails frustrate many students.

What students said

“She does not make her lectures boring. She answers questions from students about the field very well.”
PSYCH001
“Most of her lectures were really vague, me and my friend had to teach ourselves majority of the time.”
PSYCH1
“She does not give clear instructions on any of the assignments. Good luck on the and she will not help you.”
PSYCH6

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews mix easy work and funny teaching with and .

Main concern

time limit, and some students feel they learn little.

What students said

“ but match up to your notes Easy class!!!”
PSYCH001
“the midterm I finish in around 5 hours, and the final 9 hours which is no good.”
PSYCH1
“She won't provide any sort of by your own in this class.”
PYSCH001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are lengthy free-response or paragraph-based; notes help, but time cost is high and .

Long Free ResponseOpen Notes AlignmentNo Multiple ChoiceLittle Feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention long paragraph-based tests and .

Paragraph-Based TestsConfusing FinalLate Grading
“The so my tip is to start them as early as possible.”
PSYCH001
“Test is free response, long and what you get in and .”
PSYCH001

Online

Online exams are open-response and limit.

Long Free ResponseNo Time LimitNote-Based
“the midterm I finish in around 5 hours, and the final 9 hours which is no good.”
PSYCH1
“ but match up to your notes Easy class!!!”
PSYCH001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an extremely easy class and not learn anything . If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching, easy work, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Dont trust the other reviews she runs her class very well and uses real life examples people just be hating.”

👍 Recommendation Split

40/100

“ . and does not give clear communication back.”

📝

52/100

“the midterm I finish in around 5 hours, and the final 9 hours which is no good.”

😂 Lecture Energy

70/100

“She never failed to make us laugh during her lectures and we were still able to learn!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not make her lectures boring.
  • She gossiped A LOT and was always off topic.
  • Super weird, very indirect with instructions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's simple, just do your work and you get an A.
  • Her work was easy. .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very funny and up to date on her teachings.
  • She makes students uncomfortable with her comments.
  • She is an amazing teacher that helps you through class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews over several years are detailed but highly polarized, so confidence is moderate rather than high.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PSYCH35 reviews
PSYCH0013 reviews
PSYCH13 reviews
PSYCH63 reviews
PYSCH0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1