AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Danell Hepworth

ENGR1 · ETECH22 · ENGR08 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Strong choice for intro engineering if you attend, keep up with labs, and want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and helpfulLenient due datesPop quizzesHands-on labs and projectsNo Canvas grade tracking
  • Students , and lenient on due dates.
  • ENGR1 is paced and quiz-driven but manageable if , and stay current.
  • Older statics feedback is more mixed on clarity, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A grades are common , and keep pace, but and harder statics content still require real effort.

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Intro engineering feels fun and manageable, but summer pace and statics can raise the challenge quickly.

All evidence is in person across ENGR1, ETECH22, and ENGR08.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

because pop quizzes hit at the start of class and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

and recent students say she builds interest in engineering while supporting them.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students note lenient due dates, dropped worst exam or quiz, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, but , and staying current still matter.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Recent students highlight care, lab help, and clear command explanations; .

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and group design projects.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

recent ENGR1 students , and , while older statics notes weaker clarity under hard content.

Main concern

and the need to stay on top of labs so you do not fall behind.

What students said

“ and takes the time to interact with her students.”
ENGR1
“Lenient on due dates. If of class.”
ENGR1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect and exams plus labs; a .

Pop quizzes at class startExams with drop policyLabs and design projectsNo proctoring software mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses use start-of-class pop quizzes, exams, labs, and projects, with a policy that .

Pop quizzesDrops worst exam or quizGroup design projectsLab work
“ .”
ENGR1
“If of class.”
ENGR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Hepworth assured my interest in engineering. She is lenient on due dates. Attend class . Do not fall behind.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and lenient deadlines. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“If you have any questions or need help on the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“One of the .”

⏱️ Workload & Pace

58/100

“4 week summer course. Fast pace but fun. Lenient on due dates.”

📝 Assessment Style

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and takes the time to interact with her students
  • and will go through it in class
  • Her lectures can get a little boring but overall a fun class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lenient on due dates
  • but

Theme 3

🧪

  • 2 Group Design Projects
  • do the labs. Do not fall behind
  • Goes over some problems on the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Six all in-person reviews span recent ENGR1 praise and older course notes, so recent intro-engineering signal is solid but not huge.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR13 reviews
ETECH222 reviews
ENGR081 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values